Methods to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in URIs in Family Medicine Prescribers

<h3>Title</h3> Implementation of Peer Comparison Reporting and Academic Detailing Sessions to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in Upper Respiratory Infections Among Family Medicine Prescribers <h3>Background</h3> Unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing in acute upper respiratory infections (URI) is common and remains a focus of ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP).1,2 4 <h3>Setting</h3> Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) - Southeast Minnesota (SEMN) River Corridor Family Medicine (FM) Department – 40 total prescribers. <h3>Data</h3> Outcomes were analyzed using a Pearson’s chi-squared tests with p values of &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant. <h3>Intervention</h3> The initial PDSA cycle disseminated monthly peer comparison reports via email to all providers, regardless of provider type. During the 5-month course of the project, never indicated antimicrobial prescribing rates decreased from 16.81% to 14% as compared to prescribing rates during the same period the year prior. Knowledge gained from the initial PDSA cycle was used to inform a subsequent PDSA cycle. Dissemination of monthly peer comparison reporting via email was continued for APPs only. In addition to peer comparison reporting, APPs with greater than 5 prescriptions in one month and greater than 20% prescribing rate during PDSA 1 as well as those with greater than 3 prescriptions per month during PDSA 2 period were scheduled for academic detailing sessions. <h3>Results</h3> A statistically significant reduction in antimicrobial prescribing rate among APPs was observed following implementation of dissemination of peer comparison reports combined with criteria based academic detailing sessions as compared to the same in the previous year (24.14%% vs. 9.96%; p=0.001), as well as compared to the previous PDSA running from August-December 2022 with only peer comparison reporting dissemination utilized (15.16% vs. 9.96%; p=0.042). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Implementation of a multimodal program was associated with a reduction in inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing rates for URIs compared with the same period during the previous year. Further research is needed to better understand the ideal frequency of educational interventions to best support ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.5887
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in URIs in Family Medicine Prescribers

Brian Burroughs
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Methods to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in URIs in Family Medicine Prescribers

Brian Burroughs
article en

Abstract

<h3>Title</h3> Implementation of Peer Comparison Reporting and Academic Detailing Sessions to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in Upper Respiratory Infections Among Family Medicine Prescribers <h3>Background</h3> Unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing in acute upper respiratory infections (URI) is common and remains a focus of ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP).1,2 4 <h3>Setting</h3> Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) - Southeast Minnesota (SEMN) River Corridor Family Medicine (FM) Department – 40 total prescribers. <h3>Data</h3> Outcomes were analyzed using a Pearson’s chi-squared tests with p values of &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant. <h3>Intervention</h3> The initial PDSA cycle disseminated monthly peer comparison reports via email to all providers, regardless of provider type. During the 5-month course of the project, never indicated antimicrobial prescribing rates decreased from 16.81% to 14% as compared to prescribing rates during the same period the year prior. Knowledge gained from the initial PDSA cycle was used to inform a subsequent PDSA cycle. Dissemination of monthly peer comparison reporting via email was continued for APPs only. In addition to peer comparison reporting, APPs with greater than 5 prescriptions in one month and greater than 20% prescribing rate during PDSA 1 as well as those with greater than 3 prescriptions per month during PDSA 2 period were scheduled for academic detailing sessions. <h3>Results</h3> A statistically significant reduction in antimicrobial prescribing rate among APPs was observed following implementation of dissemination of peer comparison reports combined with criteria based academic detailing sessions as compared to the same in the previous year (24.14%% vs. 9.96%; p=0.001), as well as compared to the previous PDSA running from August-December 2022 with only peer comparison reporting dissemination utilized (15.16% vs. 9.96%; p=0.042). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Implementation of a multimodal program was associated with a reduction in inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing rates for URIs compared with the same period during the previous year. Further research is needed to better understand the ideal frequency of educational interventions to best support ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methods to Reduce Inappropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing Rates in URIs in Family Medicine Prescribers — Brian Burroughs · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS