Health system leader views on multi-level interventions to increase lung cancer screening

<h3>Background:</h3> Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Unfortunately, lung cancer screening (LCS) rates are low, with &lt;10% of eligible individuals undergoing screening. Health system support is needed to raise these rates, but most have provided modest support thus far. As part of a larger research study, we conducted a key-informant interview with leaders of four health systems to learn their views about barriers to and facilitators of LCS. <h3>Methods:</h3> Interviews were conducted with leaders from Christiana Care Health System (CCHS), Jefferson Health (JH), Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), and Penn State Health (PSH). Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the research team developed an interview guide to elicit respondent views of provider and patient support interventions designed to increase LCS rates. We audio-recorded each interview and prepared written transcripts. Using NVivo qualitative analysis software, two research coordinators reviewed and coded each transcript independently. The reviewers discussed instances in which there was disagreement about coding and reached consensus. <h3>Results.</h3> We completed interviews with 39 of 41 invited health system leaders (CCHS: 7, JH:I4, LVHN: 7, PSH: 11) and identified three major response categories: system, provider, and patient. The system category focused on the value of quality metrics (outer domain) and coordinating of intervention implementation (inner domain); the provider category highlighted the need for provider training and incentives (inner domain) and support for practice personnel (individual domain); and the patient category underscored the importance of screening costs (inner domain) and patient outreach (individual and process domains). <h3>Discussion.</h3> These findings provide health systems with important insights into obstacles and opportunities related to implementing effective interventions in primary care to increase LCS in diverse populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6342
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health system leader views on multi-level interventions to increase lung cancer screening

Ayako Shimada, H. G. Reynolds, Randa Sifri, Ronald Myers et al.
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Health system leader views on multi-level interventions to increase lung cancer screening

Ayako Shimada, H. G. Reynolds, Randa Sifri, Ronald Myers, Lera Thompson, Heather Bittner Fagan, B. Jackson, Munjireen Sifat, Melissa DiCarlo, Beth Careyva, Amanda Indictor, Nicole Burgess, Melanie Johnson, Todd Felix
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background:</h3> Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Unfortunately, lung cancer screening (LCS) rates are low, with &lt;10% of eligible individuals undergoing screening. Health system support is needed to raise these rates, but most have provided modest support thus far. As part of a larger research study, we conducted a key-informant interview with leaders of four health systems to learn their views about barriers to and facilitators of LCS. <h3>Methods:</h3> Interviews were conducted with leaders from Christiana Care Health System (CCHS), Jefferson Health (JH), Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), and Penn State Health (PSH). Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the research team developed an interview guide to elicit respondent views of provider and patient support interventions designed to increase LCS rates. We audio-recorded each interview and prepared written transcripts. Using NVivo qualitative analysis software, two research coordinators reviewed and coded each transcript independently. The reviewers discussed instances in which there was disagreement about coding and reached consensus. <h3>Results.</h3> We completed interviews with 39 of 41 invited health system leaders (CCHS: 7, JH:I4, LVHN: 7, PSH: 11) and identified three major response categories: system, provider, and patient. The system category focused on the value of quality metrics (outer domain) and coordinating of intervention implementation (inner domain); the provider category highlighted the need for provider training and incentives (inner domain) and support for practice personnel (individual domain); and the patient category underscored the importance of screening costs (inner domain) and patient outreach (individual and process domains). <h3>Discussion.</h3> These findings provide health systems with important insights into obstacles and opportunities related to implementing effective interventions in primary care to increase LCS in diverse populations.

Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.