Planning scale-up of integrated care programs for people with complex needs: a multiple case study

<h3>Context:</h3> Adults with complex needs require health and social services from a variety of providers, which can lead to frequent use of services. Appropriate care for these people calls for integrated care. However, few studies assessed the organizational conditions to implement integrated care programs (ICP), in preparation for scale-up. <h3>Objectives:</h3> 1) implement an ICP for adults with complex needs in health and social services organizations and primary care clinics; 2) evaluate organizational and governance factors influencing implementation; and 3) make recommendations from key stakeholders to facilitate scale-up. <h3>Study Design:</h3> A qualitative multiple-case study design. <h3>Setting:</h3> Two health and social services organizations and 5 primary care clinics in Quebec, Canada. Population studied: Key informants involved in the implementation: people with complex needs (n = 2), managers (n = 17), hospital case manager (n = 1), case managers in primary care clinics (n = 14), project managers (n = 2), physicians in charge of participating clinics (n = 4), and other healthcare professionals (n = 2). <h3>Intervention:</h3> A case management program including 4 components: 1) patient needs assessment; 2) care planning and development of an individualized services plan; 3) navigation and coordination of services; 4) education and self-management support.Methods: <h3>Implementation process:</h3> Case A: 8 operational committee meetings; 20 clinical support meetings; 16 people trained. Case B: 12 operational committee meetings; 8 clinical support meetings; 14 people trained. <h3>Data collection:</h3> participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups. <h3>Analysis:</h3> Data were analyzed together using a deductive (RE-AIM framework) and inductive thematic analysis. Case stories were developed and then compared. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Organizational and governance factors influencing the implementation of ICP, and recommendations to facilitate scale-up. <h3>Results:</h3> Identifying patients targeted by the ICP was challenging. Better access to health information technology for case-finding was strongly recommended. Remuneration methods compatible with family physicians’ commitment to the program were needed to promote their engagement. Appropriate change management, including external facilitation, was also important to promote implementation and ensure sustainability of ICP over time. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study may inform stakeholders interested in scaling up ICP for adults with complex needs.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6082
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning scale-up of integrated care programs for people with complex needs: a multiple case study

Catherine Maisonneuve, Olivier Dumont‐Samson, Marie-Dominique Poirier, Émilie Angrignon‐Girouard et al.
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Planning scale-up of integrated care programs for people with complex needs: a multiple case study

Catherine Maisonneuve, Olivier Dumont‐Samson, Marie-Dominique Poirier, Émilie Angrignon‐Girouard, Maud‐Christine Chouinard, Catherine Hudon, Mathieu Bisson, Alexandra Lemay-Compagnat
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Adults with complex needs require health and social services from a variety of providers, which can lead to frequent use of services. Appropriate care for these people calls for integrated care. However, few studies assessed the organizational conditions to implement integrated care programs (ICP), in preparation for scale-up. <h3>Objectives:</h3> 1) implement an ICP for adults with complex needs in health and social services organizations and primary care clinics; 2) evaluate organizational and governance factors influencing implementation; and 3) make recommendations from key stakeholders to facilitate scale-up. <h3>Study Design:</h3> A qualitative multiple-case study design. <h3>Setting:</h3> Two health and social services organizations and 5 primary care clinics in Quebec, Canada. Population studied: Key informants involved in the implementation: people with complex needs (n = 2), managers (n = 17), hospital case manager (n = 1), case managers in primary care clinics (n = 14), project managers (n = 2), physicians in charge of participating clinics (n = 4), and other healthcare professionals (n = 2). <h3>Intervention:</h3> A case management program including 4 components: 1) patient needs assessment; 2) care planning and development of an individualized services plan; 3) navigation and coordination of services; 4) education and self-management support.Methods: <h3>Implementation process:</h3> Case A: 8 operational committee meetings; 20 clinical support meetings; 16 people trained. Case B: 12 operational committee meetings; 8 clinical support meetings; 14 people trained. <h3>Data collection:</h3> participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups. <h3>Analysis:</h3> Data were analyzed together using a deductive (RE-AIM framework) and inductive thematic analysis. Case stories were developed and then compared. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Organizational and governance factors influencing the implementation of ICP, and recommendations to facilitate scale-up. <h3>Results:</h3> Identifying patients targeted by the ICP was challenging. Better access to health information technology for case-finding was strongly recommended. Remuneration methods compatible with family physicians’ commitment to the program were needed to promote their engagement. Appropriate change management, including external facilitation, was also important to promote implementation and ensure sustainability of ICP over time. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study may inform stakeholders interested in scaling up ICP for adults with complex needs.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.