One Person or a Group of Doctors as Personal Health Care Provider: The Association with Quality of Care for Diabetes

<h3>Background:</h3> Diabetes (DM) is a common chronic condition, yet the quality of care varies. It is unclear whether a group of doctors provides better care than a single person. <h3>Objective:</h3> To examine the association between DM quality of care and whether patients reported having a single person, a group of doctors, or none as their personal health care provider. <h3>Methods:</h3> Cross-sectional analysis of 2022 BRFSS survey data, which provides nationally representative estimates for the US. The population studied was adults aged 18+ years with self-reported diagnosed type 1 or type 2 DM. The instrument used to assess quality of care comprised 6 measures of DM care from the 2021 American Diabetes Association Guidelines, and 1 summated composite measure of the 6 individual measures. <h3>Results:</h3> A total of n=11508, unweighted (n =3685106, weighted) individuals self-reported diagnosed type 1 or type 2 DM in 2022. 54.53% of patients reported having one person as their personal health care provider, while 38.78% reported having a group of doctors as their personal health care provider, and 6.69% reported having neither one person, nor a group of doctors as their personal health care provider. Patients with a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had the highest mean score for the composite measure. However, all patients had mean scores of &lt;2 out 6 measures. The results of the adjusted regression showed that, compared with patients who reported having one person as their personal health care provider, the patients with neither one person nor a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had worse quality of care (Beta estimate -0.32; SE 0.0006) while the patients with a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had slightly better quality of care (Beta estimate 0.14; SE 0.00002) (p&lt;.0001). In total, only 0.19% (SE 0.02) of patients received all 6 DM quality measures. 1.71% (SE 0.06) of patients received 5 of 6 quality measures, 3.08% (SE 0.08) received 4 of 6 quality measures, 14.47% (SE 0.29) received 3 of 6 quality measures, 35.51% (SE 0.45) received 2 of 6 quality measures, 28.03% (SE 0.43) received 1 of 6 quality measures, and 17.02% (SE 0.37) received 0 of 6 quality measures. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Quality of care for diabetes is significantly associated with whether patients report having one person, a group of doctors, or their personal health care provider. Quality of care for diabetes is sub-optimal for all patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6144
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Person or a Group of Doctors as Personal Health Care Provider: The Association with Quality of Care for Diabetes

Pooja Sharma, Arch G. Mainous, James F. Medley, D H Rubin et al.
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

One Person or a Group of Doctors as Personal Health Care Provider: The Association with Quality of Care for Diabetes

Pooja Sharma, Arch G. Mainous, James F. Medley, D H Rubin, Rachel Liu-Galvin
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background:</h3> Diabetes (DM) is a common chronic condition, yet the quality of care varies. It is unclear whether a group of doctors provides better care than a single person. <h3>Objective:</h3> To examine the association between DM quality of care and whether patients reported having a single person, a group of doctors, or none as their personal health care provider. <h3>Methods:</h3> Cross-sectional analysis of 2022 BRFSS survey data, which provides nationally representative estimates for the US. The population studied was adults aged 18+ years with self-reported diagnosed type 1 or type 2 DM. The instrument used to assess quality of care comprised 6 measures of DM care from the 2021 American Diabetes Association Guidelines, and 1 summated composite measure of the 6 individual measures. <h3>Results:</h3> A total of n=11508, unweighted (n =3685106, weighted) individuals self-reported diagnosed type 1 or type 2 DM in 2022. 54.53% of patients reported having one person as their personal health care provider, while 38.78% reported having a group of doctors as their personal health care provider, and 6.69% reported having neither one person, nor a group of doctors as their personal health care provider. Patients with a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had the highest mean score for the composite measure. However, all patients had mean scores of &lt;2 out 6 measures. The results of the adjusted regression showed that, compared with patients who reported having one person as their personal health care provider, the patients with neither one person nor a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had worse quality of care (Beta estimate -0.32; SE 0.0006) while the patients with a group of doctors as their personal health care provider had slightly better quality of care (Beta estimate 0.14; SE 0.00002) (p&lt;.0001). In total, only 0.19% (SE 0.02) of patients received all 6 DM quality measures. 1.71% (SE 0.06) of patients received 5 of 6 quality measures, 3.08% (SE 0.08) received 4 of 6 quality measures, 14.47% (SE 0.29) received 3 of 6 quality measures, 35.51% (SE 0.45) received 2 of 6 quality measures, 28.03% (SE 0.43) received 1 of 6 quality measures, and 17.02% (SE 0.37) received 0 of 6 quality measures. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Quality of care for diabetes is significantly associated with whether patients report having one person, a group of doctors, or their personal health care provider. Quality of care for diabetes is sub-optimal for all patients.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.