Nurturing collaboration between non-profit organizations and primary healthcare partners: An instrumental case study

<h3>Context:</h3> People living in precarious socio-economic conditions are at greater risk of developing mental and physical health disorders, and of having complex healthcare and social needs (hereafter complex needs). Appropriate care for these people calls for integrated care from the healthcare, social services, and community networks. Few studies assessed the factors influencing cross-sectoral collaboration between non-profit organizations (NPOs) and primary healthcare partners. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To identify challenges and facilitators to collaborations between a NPO and primary healthcare partners. <h3>Study design:</h3> An instrumental case study design. <h3>Setting:</h3> A NPO and its partners in the healthcare (primary care clinics), social services, and community networks in a rural context. <h3>Population studied:</h3> Key informants involved in intersectoral collaborations: people with complex needs (n=2), healthcare and social services professionals (n=10), managers (n=7), board of directors’ members (n=2), support staff (n=1). <h3>Methods:</h3> Data collection: Non-participant observation (n=14 meetings; n=2 clinical sessions) and semi-structured interviews (n=22). <h3>Analysis:</h3> Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. <h3>Outcome measures:</h3> Challenges and facilitators influencing intersectoral collaborations. <h3>Results:</h3> The organizational context created tensions between the NPO and their partners that must present “good statistics” to receive optimal financial resources. This climate of competition was not conducive to collaboration. Clear and complementary service offers could reduce those tensions. A fragmented vision led to major conflicts, so shared vision among stakeholders was helpful to promote collaboration. Impressions and unspoken words escalated into interpersonal conflicts when communication was poor. Clear communication was then essential not only for aligning visions, but also for building healthy interpersonal relationships and mutual trust, key to successful collaborations. Trained staff, in sufficient numbers, who remain stable over time, also helped building relationships and trust between qualified individuals from different organizations. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Intersectoral collaboration between NPOs and primary healthcare partners raised many challenges. Potential conflicts linked to financial competition, a fragmented vision or false impressions were gradually resolved with open communication and efforts to understand others’ perspective.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6303
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurturing collaboration between non-profit organizations and primary healthcare partners: An instrumental case study

Christine Loignon, Olivier Dumont‐Samson, Marie‐Claude Jacques, Mylaine Breton et al.
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Nurturing collaboration between non-profit organizations and primary healthcare partners: An instrumental case study

Christine Loignon, Olivier Dumont‐Samson, Marie‐Claude Jacques, Mylaine Breton, Émilie Hudon, Catherine Hudon
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> People living in precarious socio-economic conditions are at greater risk of developing mental and physical health disorders, and of having complex healthcare and social needs (hereafter complex needs). Appropriate care for these people calls for integrated care from the healthcare, social services, and community networks. Few studies assessed the factors influencing cross-sectoral collaboration between non-profit organizations (NPOs) and primary healthcare partners. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To identify challenges and facilitators to collaborations between a NPO and primary healthcare partners. <h3>Study design:</h3> An instrumental case study design. <h3>Setting:</h3> A NPO and its partners in the healthcare (primary care clinics), social services, and community networks in a rural context. <h3>Population studied:</h3> Key informants involved in intersectoral collaborations: people with complex needs (n=2), healthcare and social services professionals (n=10), managers (n=7), board of directors’ members (n=2), support staff (n=1). <h3>Methods:</h3> Data collection: Non-participant observation (n=14 meetings; n=2 clinical sessions) and semi-structured interviews (n=22). <h3>Analysis:</h3> Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. <h3>Outcome measures:</h3> Challenges and facilitators influencing intersectoral collaborations. <h3>Results:</h3> The organizational context created tensions between the NPO and their partners that must present “good statistics” to receive optimal financial resources. This climate of competition was not conducive to collaboration. Clear and complementary service offers could reduce those tensions. A fragmented vision led to major conflicts, so shared vision among stakeholders was helpful to promote collaboration. Impressions and unspoken words escalated into interpersonal conflicts when communication was poor. Clear communication was then essential not only for aligning visions, but also for building healthy interpersonal relationships and mutual trust, key to successful collaborations. Trained staff, in sufficient numbers, who remain stable over time, also helped building relationships and trust between qualified individuals from different organizations. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Intersectoral collaboration between NPOs and primary healthcare partners raised many challenges. Potential conflicts linked to financial competition, a fragmented vision or false impressions were gradually resolved with open communication and efforts to understand others’ perspective.

Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.