OECD Patient-Reported Indicators Survey (PaRIS) in Canada: Results From the National Study

<h3>Context:</h3> The PaRIS-Survey, developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, provides international standards for reporting on health system performance. While collecting patient-reported experiences and outcomes is increasingly integrated into acute care, the PaRIS-Survey is the first primary care practice-based survey across multiple OECD countries. <h3>Objective:</h3> Our objective is to compare health outcomes and experiences of patients with chronic conditions cared for in primary care settings. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Cross-sectional study design. We conducted descriptive and inferential statistics. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Canadian primary care practices in 10 provinces. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Patients aged 45 years or older with at least one registered contact in the six months before study implementation. Primary care practices were the setting where patients were recruited. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> A practice and patient survey were developed based on the PaRIS-Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) survey’s framework and standardized across 22 participating OECD countries. Providers completed the 34-item practice survey. The patient questionnaire (121 items) was organized around four domains related to health and experiences of primary care services and sociodemographic characteristics. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient-reported experiences and outcomes and practice characteristics. <h3>Results:</h3> Across 8 provinces, more than 65 practices and 4630 patients participated. Seven out of 10 patients report they were not as involved as they wanted to be in decisions about their care; 69% reported they were not considered a “whole person” but just a disease. About 14% of patients reported Poor or Fair mental health, with an increase to 18% regarding physical health. One-third reported that pain interferes with their day-to-day activities. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The PaRIS-survey provides the only standardized primary care practice and patient-reported experience and outcome measures administered across Canada. These measures enable patients’ voices on outcomes and experiences of primary care that matter most. Understanding patient reported experiences and outcomes on a regular basis can be used to enable improved operational abilities meant to better meet the needs of patients accessing primary care.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6211
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OECD Patient-Reported Indicators Survey (PaRIS) in Canada: Results From the National Study

Vanessa T. Vaillancourt, Vivian R. Ramsden, Andrea Gruneir, Sabrina T. Wong et al.
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

OECD Patient-Reported Indicators Survey (PaRIS) in Canada: Results From the National Study

Vanessa T. Vaillancourt, Vivian R. Ramsden, Andrea Gruneir, Sabrina T. Wong, Nazeem Muhajarine, Walter P. Wodchis, Marie-Ève Poitras, Shelley Anne Doucet, Gillian Bartlett‐Esquilant, Charlotte M. Schwarz, Charlotte Jensen, Udoka Okpalauwaekwe, Leanne Kosowan, Rubee Dev, Vijay Kunaratnam, Fazle Sharior
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> The PaRIS-Survey, developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, provides international standards for reporting on health system performance. While collecting patient-reported experiences and outcomes is increasingly integrated into acute care, the PaRIS-Survey is the first primary care practice-based survey across multiple OECD countries. <h3>Objective:</h3> Our objective is to compare health outcomes and experiences of patients with chronic conditions cared for in primary care settings. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Cross-sectional study design. We conducted descriptive and inferential statistics. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Canadian primary care practices in 10 provinces. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Patients aged 45 years or older with at least one registered contact in the six months before study implementation. Primary care practices were the setting where patients were recruited. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> A practice and patient survey were developed based on the PaRIS-Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) survey’s framework and standardized across 22 participating OECD countries. Providers completed the 34-item practice survey. The patient questionnaire (121 items) was organized around four domains related to health and experiences of primary care services and sociodemographic characteristics. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient-reported experiences and outcomes and practice characteristics. <h3>Results:</h3> Across 8 provinces, more than 65 practices and 4630 patients participated. Seven out of 10 patients report they were not as involved as they wanted to be in decisions about their care; 69% reported they were not considered a “whole person” but just a disease. About 14% of patients reported Poor or Fair mental health, with an increase to 18% regarding physical health. One-third reported that pain interferes with their day-to-day activities. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The PaRIS-survey provides the only standardized primary care practice and patient-reported experience and outcome measures administered across Canada. These measures enable patients’ voices on outcomes and experiences of primary care that matter most. Understanding patient reported experiences and outcomes on a regular basis can be used to enable improved operational abilities meant to better meet the needs of patients accessing primary care.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.