Clinician perception of the relationship between mental health, health-related social needs, and diabetes outcomes

<h3>Context:</h3> Health-promoting behaviors are crucial for good outcomes in diabetes. However, mental health conditions and health-related social needs (HRSNs) can complicate patients’ success. Addressing mental health and HRSNs can improve diabetes outcomes, but stigma surrounding these issues can make both patients and providers uncomfortable during clinical discussions. Consequently, clinicians may avoid these stigmatized topics and provide general recommendations that can’t be followed by patients. <h3>Objective:</h3> To understand how clinicians perceive and discuss the relationship between mental health, HRSNs, and health-promoting behavior with patients with diabetes. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> An exploratory study using key informant interviews and content analysis to develop major themes. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Interviews with 21 primary care clinicians in Colorado who treat patients with diabetes. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Clinicians across a range of roles and geographic locations, represented 11 different primary care clinics located in both rural and urban areas of Colorado. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Semi-structured interview guide. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Emergent themes. <h3>Results:</h3> Preliminary analyses revealed the following overarching themes: 1) diabetes, mental health and mental health conditions or challenges, and HRSNs contribute to a cycle of diabetes distress (i.e., a person’s experience with problems associated with diabetes) that is made worse by experience of stigma and impacts clinical outcomes, 2) clinicians try to use empathetic and non-judgmental communication but often feel ill-equipped to discuss how these factors intersect during patient visits due to short appointments and variability in patients’ responses to the same challenges and consequently helpless to break this cycle, and 3) implementing a team-based approach to care that involves diabetes-specific screening for mental health conditions and HRSNs and behavioral health and case management support and resources could help. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study highlights the complexities of treating chronic conditions like diabetes that involve a high degree of patient engagement and self-management over time, particularly among patients who experience co-occurring mental health conditions and HRSNs. Screening for mental health and HRSNs that is specific to diabetes should be integrated into standardized workflows, but doing so successfully likely relies on the inclusion of an interdisciplinary care team.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6459
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician perception of the relationship between mental health, health-related social needs, and diabetes outcomes

Rebekah Gomes, Carlee Kreisel, Andrea Nederveld, Lauren Woodward Tolle et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Clinician perception of the relationship between mental health, health-related social needs, and diabetes outcomes

Rebekah Gomes, Carlee Kreisel, Andrea Nederveld, Lauren Woodward Tolle, Caroline Tietbohl
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Health-promoting behaviors are crucial for good outcomes in diabetes. However, mental health conditions and health-related social needs (HRSNs) can complicate patients’ success. Addressing mental health and HRSNs can improve diabetes outcomes, but stigma surrounding these issues can make both patients and providers uncomfortable during clinical discussions. Consequently, clinicians may avoid these stigmatized topics and provide general recommendations that can’t be followed by patients. <h3>Objective:</h3> To understand how clinicians perceive and discuss the relationship between mental health, HRSNs, and health-promoting behavior with patients with diabetes. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> An exploratory study using key informant interviews and content analysis to develop major themes. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Interviews with 21 primary care clinicians in Colorado who treat patients with diabetes. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Clinicians across a range of roles and geographic locations, represented 11 different primary care clinics located in both rural and urban areas of Colorado. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Semi-structured interview guide. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Emergent themes. <h3>Results:</h3> Preliminary analyses revealed the following overarching themes: 1) diabetes, mental health and mental health conditions or challenges, and HRSNs contribute to a cycle of diabetes distress (i.e., a person’s experience with problems associated with diabetes) that is made worse by experience of stigma and impacts clinical outcomes, 2) clinicians try to use empathetic and non-judgmental communication but often feel ill-equipped to discuss how these factors intersect during patient visits due to short appointments and variability in patients’ responses to the same challenges and consequently helpless to break this cycle, and 3) implementing a team-based approach to care that involves diabetes-specific screening for mental health conditions and HRSNs and behavioral health and case management support and resources could help. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study highlights the complexities of treating chronic conditions like diabetes that involve a high degree of patient engagement and self-management over time, particularly among patients who experience co-occurring mental health conditions and HRSNs. Screening for mental health and HRSNs that is specific to diabetes should be integrated into standardized workflows, but doing so successfully likely relies on the inclusion of an interdisciplinary care team.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.