A Framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making

<h3>Context:</h3> Digital Twins (DTs) are innovative tools that blend physical and virtual objects, with potential to transform health care. Despite the growing interest in DTs, the healthcare sector lacks unified frameworks that can explain the development, evaluation, and implementation of DTs in clinical decision-making. <h3>Objective:</h3> This study aims to map the existing knowledge on DTs in clinical decision-making, and establish a comprehensive framework for AI-enabled DTs in clinical decision-making. <h3>Study Design:</h3> We performed a scoping review searching three electronic databases. <h3>Dataset:</h3> We systematically searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and IEEE Xplore on August 4, 2023. <h3>Population studied:</h3> We included studies reporting results on the development, evaluation, and implementation of DTs for clinical decision-making. The study selection and data extraction was carried out by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer and disagreements were resolved through meetings. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> A descriptive analysis was performed. Key steps in DT development and their function were identified and combined to create a framework. <h3>Results:</h3> Out of 271 records found, 193 were screened, leading to the inclusion of seven reviews and four empirical studies, all published from 2020 onwards. The reviews contained either a framework or information that was used to construct our newly developed framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making. Three empirical studies reported the development of a DT, and one reported a common infrastructure for a wide range of applications for a DT. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> We developed a framework that requires further investigations, such as validation and implementation in different use cases. The steps that we have identified could serve as a guide to future researchers. Strengthening and standardizing DTs in clinical decision-making is important, as is assessing their effects on different populations and environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6092
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making

Farbod Khameneifar, Amalia M. Issa, Ashkan Baradaran, Geneviève Gore et al.
4 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.48
article

A Framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making

Farbod Khameneifar, Amalia M. Issa, Ashkan Baradaran, Geneviève Gore, Samira Rahimi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Digital Twins (DTs) are innovative tools that blend physical and virtual objects, with potential to transform health care. Despite the growing interest in DTs, the healthcare sector lacks unified frameworks that can explain the development, evaluation, and implementation of DTs in clinical decision-making. <h3>Objective:</h3> This study aims to map the existing knowledge on DTs in clinical decision-making, and establish a comprehensive framework for AI-enabled DTs in clinical decision-making. <h3>Study Design:</h3> We performed a scoping review searching three electronic databases. <h3>Dataset:</h3> We systematically searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and IEEE Xplore on August 4, 2023. <h3>Population studied:</h3> We included studies reporting results on the development, evaluation, and implementation of DTs for clinical decision-making. The study selection and data extraction was carried out by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer and disagreements were resolved through meetings. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> A descriptive analysis was performed. Key steps in DT development and their function were identified and combined to create a framework. <h3>Results:</h3> Out of 271 records found, 193 were screened, leading to the inclusion of seven reviews and four empirical studies, all published from 2020 onwards. The reviews contained either a framework or information that was used to construct our newly developed framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making. Three empirical studies reported the development of a DT, and one reported a common infrastructure for a wide range of applications for a DT. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> We developed a framework that requires further investigations, such as validation and implementation in different use cases. The steps that we have identified could serve as a guide to future researchers. Strengthening and standardizing DTs in clinical decision-making is important, as is assessing their effects on different populations and environments.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Framework for AI-enabled Digital Twins in Clinical Decision-making — Farbod Khameneifar, Amalia M. Issa, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS