Features of Effective Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health: Primary Care Practice Members Weigh In

<h3>Context:</h3> Integrating behavioral health with primary care has may be able to increase access, improve outcomes, and decrease costs. Perspectives from clinicians and staff conducting integration is valuable to understand facilitators and issues in integration behavioral health (IBH) care in primary care. <h3>Objective:</h3> Evaluate the experiences of those involved in Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH+) integration effort. <h3>Study Design/Analysis:</h3> Multi-method design. All clinicians and staff at CIBH+ participating clinics completed an online survey on feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of CIBH+ (descriptive statistical analysis); Semi-structured interviews with leaders, clinicians and staff involved in CIBH+ implementation (iterative constant comparative analysis). <h3>Setting:</h3> Seven family medicine practices in one Colorado USA health system. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Primary care clinicians and staff, including IBH psychologists and psychiatrists. <h3>Intervention:</h3> NA for this portion of the study. Therapeutic services were provided to patients by IBH psychologists and psychiatrists. Outcome <h3>Measures:</h3> Qualitative - Survey including the FIM, AIM and IAM, which includes 12-items and a 5-point Likert rating of implementation feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. Qualitative - Major themes on facilitators and barriers discussed for CIBH+. <h3>Results:</h3> 145 surveys and 46 interviews were completed. Survey responses were overwhelmingly positive with as respondents 90% “Agreed” or “Completely Agreed” on all items that CIBH+ was feasible, acceptable, and appropriate. Qualitative themes included benefits for patients (improved access and reach, improved comprehensive care), physical and social facilitators to implementation (dedicated time and space for integration improvements, leadership support, telehealth/telepsychiatry support), and remaining challenges (issues with model for all patients, role clarity, physical space, staff capacity). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> CIBH+ was very highly supported by all practice clinicians and staff. Those who participated in implementation saw clear benefit to patients and identified what made those benefits easier to realize. After implementation, some remaining challenges were identified which can help guide future implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6394
Primary Topic
Human Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Features of Effective Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health: Primary Care Practice Members Weigh In

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Jay H. Shore, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H. Fernald et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Human Health and Disease
article

Features of Effective Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health: Primary Care Practice Members Weigh In

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Jay H. Shore, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H. Fernald, Lakshmi Karra
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Integrating behavioral health with primary care has may be able to increase access, improve outcomes, and decrease costs. Perspectives from clinicians and staff conducting integration is valuable to understand facilitators and issues in integration behavioral health (IBH) care in primary care. <h3>Objective:</h3> Evaluate the experiences of those involved in Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH+) integration effort. <h3>Study Design/Analysis:</h3> Multi-method design. All clinicians and staff at CIBH+ participating clinics completed an online survey on feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of CIBH+ (descriptive statistical analysis); Semi-structured interviews with leaders, clinicians and staff involved in CIBH+ implementation (iterative constant comparative analysis). <h3>Setting:</h3> Seven family medicine practices in one Colorado USA health system. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Primary care clinicians and staff, including IBH psychologists and psychiatrists. <h3>Intervention:</h3> NA for this portion of the study. Therapeutic services were provided to patients by IBH psychologists and psychiatrists. Outcome <h3>Measures:</h3> Qualitative - Survey including the FIM, AIM and IAM, which includes 12-items and a 5-point Likert rating of implementation feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. Qualitative - Major themes on facilitators and barriers discussed for CIBH+. <h3>Results:</h3> 145 surveys and 46 interviews were completed. Survey responses were overwhelmingly positive with as respondents 90% “Agreed” or “Completely Agreed” on all items that CIBH+ was feasible, acceptable, and appropriate. Qualitative themes included benefits for patients (improved access and reach, improved comprehensive care), physical and social facilitators to implementation (dedicated time and space for integration improvements, leadership support, telehealth/telepsychiatry support), and remaining challenges (issues with model for all patients, role clarity, physical space, staff capacity). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> CIBH+ was very highly supported by all practice clinicians and staff. Those who participated in implementation saw clear benefit to patients and identified what made those benefits easier to realize. After implementation, some remaining challenges were identified which can help guide future implementation.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Human Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.