The Good, the Bad and the Necessity of Locum Tenens

<h3>Context:</h3> Recent Family Physician graduates practicing as locum tenens has been sometimes presented as a double-edged sword in addressing the Family Medicine workforce crisis. While the concept of locums dates back to the 1970s, examination of the advantages and disadvantages that drive the decision to do locums is needed in the current context. <h3>Objective:</h3> To explore the factors influencing early career family physicians’ (FPs) decision to do locums. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) study using in-depth interviews via Zoom. Analysis conducted according to CGT methodology. <h3>Setting:</h3> FP practices in Ontario, Canada. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> 38 FPs practicing in Ontario, who completed their training between 2017 to 2022. <h3>Results:</h3> 9 participants were currently working as a locum, 14 participants had done locums prior to establishing a practice, and 15 had chosen not to locum but go directly into practice, often taking on an available practice. Participants were pulled towards doing locums because they offered opportunities to experience different practice styles and locations, allowed scheduling flexibility, and were viewed as a potential way to enhance work-life balance. Other prominent attractions included the numerous locums available, as well as the opportunity to provide needed coverage for their physician colleagues (e.g. parental leave). Factors pushing participants away from deciding to locum were the inability to provide continuity of care for patients and limited autonomy in altering established clinic protocols. The financial instability of doing locums was also seen as a disadvantage but was lessened by the availability of locums, with long-term locums being most attractive. However, some participants expressed that moving constantly from locum to locum was challenging, first, in identifying a new locum opportunity, and second, in learning about that clinic and the patients for whom they were responsible. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Study findings suggest that several push and pull factors influence the decision to do locums following graduation. Reasons for locums showed similarities to previous research but findings illuminate the current status of locum tenens in the context of increasing family physician shortages in Ontario, Canada.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6417
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Good, the Bad and the Necessity of Locum Tenens

Bridget Ryan, Amanda Terry, Kamila Premji, Maria Mathews et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

The Good, the Bad and the Necessity of Locum Tenens

Bridget Ryan, Amanda Terry, Kamila Premji, Maria Mathews, Sharon Bal, Judith K. Brown, Cathy Thorpe, C. George
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Recent Family Physician graduates practicing as locum tenens has been sometimes presented as a double-edged sword in addressing the Family Medicine workforce crisis. While the concept of locums dates back to the 1970s, examination of the advantages and disadvantages that drive the decision to do locums is needed in the current context. <h3>Objective:</h3> To explore the factors influencing early career family physicians’ (FPs) decision to do locums. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) study using in-depth interviews via Zoom. Analysis conducted according to CGT methodology. <h3>Setting:</h3> FP practices in Ontario, Canada. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> 38 FPs practicing in Ontario, who completed their training between 2017 to 2022. <h3>Results:</h3> 9 participants were currently working as a locum, 14 participants had done locums prior to establishing a practice, and 15 had chosen not to locum but go directly into practice, often taking on an available practice. Participants were pulled towards doing locums because they offered opportunities to experience different practice styles and locations, allowed scheduling flexibility, and were viewed as a potential way to enhance work-life balance. Other prominent attractions included the numerous locums available, as well as the opportunity to provide needed coverage for their physician colleagues (e.g. parental leave). Factors pushing participants away from deciding to locum were the inability to provide continuity of care for patients and limited autonomy in altering established clinic protocols. The financial instability of doing locums was also seen as a disadvantage but was lessened by the availability of locums, with long-term locums being most attractive. However, some participants expressed that moving constantly from locum to locum was challenging, first, in identifying a new locum opportunity, and second, in learning about that clinic and the patients for whom they were responsible. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Study findings suggest that several push and pull factors influence the decision to do locums following graduation. Reasons for locums showed similarities to previous research but findings illuminate the current status of locum tenens in the context of increasing family physician shortages in Ontario, Canada.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.