What Does Team Function Look Like in Primary Care Integrated Behavioral Health?

<h3>Context:</h3> Up to 30% of patients seen in primary care have a co-occurring mental health or substance use issue. Integrating mental and behavioral health with primary care may increase access, improve outcomes, and decrease overall health care costs. However, successful implementation means overcoming challenges to integration, including adding new team members and clarifying their roles. <h3>Objective:</h3> Evaluate team structures and processes across the Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH+) team. <h3>Study Design/Analysis:</h3> Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with leaders, clinicians and staff. Iterative constant comparative analysis of interview data. <h3>Setting:</h3> Seven primary care practices in one Colorado USA health system. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Medical providers and staff, and integrated behavioral health (IBH) psychologists and psychiatrists. <h3>Intervention:</h3> N/A for this portion; therapeutic services were provided by IBH providers to patients. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Major themes in teamwork components from the Salas, et al. “Big Five of Teamwork” Framework. <h3>Results:</h3> 46 interviews were completed. <h3>(1) Team leadership:</h3> clinic-level leadership strongly supports IBH, valuing ongoing integration, helping establish positive atmosphere and coordinate and plan improvements. <h3>(2) Mutual performance monitoring:</h3> respondents described common processes to monitor others’ performance and provide feedback to improve performance through planned and ad hoc meetings. <h3>(3) Backup behavior:</h3> team members worked together to shift workloads when sensing burden among other team members, often in other roles. <h3>(4) Adaptability:</h3> respondents described localized adaptations to adjust team member routines to serve patients’ behavioral health facilitated by operational freedom to fit their context. <h3>(5) Team orientation:</h3> respondents described shared overall goals of CIBH+ and describe ability to share information, take into account multiple views, and strategize together to deliver timely needed care to patients. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> CIBH+ team members described components that support effective teamwork but could benefit from planned information sharing, role clarification, and adaptation strategies. Thoughtful team-based approaches, when used, were helpful to implementing IBH. Formalized team processes could strengthen CIBH+ team function, though busy primary care practices may have limited capacity to address teamwork.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6389
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Does Team Function Look Like in Primary Care Integrated Behavioral Health?

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Jay H. Shore, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H. Fernald et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

What Does Team Function Look Like in Primary Care Integrated Behavioral Health?

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Jay H. Shore, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H. Fernald, Lakshmi Karra
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Up to 30% of patients seen in primary care have a co-occurring mental health or substance use issue. Integrating mental and behavioral health with primary care may increase access, improve outcomes, and decrease overall health care costs. However, successful implementation means overcoming challenges to integration, including adding new team members and clarifying their roles. <h3>Objective:</h3> Evaluate team structures and processes across the Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH+) team. <h3>Study Design/Analysis:</h3> Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with leaders, clinicians and staff. Iterative constant comparative analysis of interview data. <h3>Setting:</h3> Seven primary care practices in one Colorado USA health system. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Medical providers and staff, and integrated behavioral health (IBH) psychologists and psychiatrists. <h3>Intervention:</h3> N/A for this portion; therapeutic services were provided by IBH providers to patients. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Major themes in teamwork components from the Salas, et al. “Big Five of Teamwork” Framework. <h3>Results:</h3> 46 interviews were completed. <h3>(1) Team leadership:</h3> clinic-level leadership strongly supports IBH, valuing ongoing integration, helping establish positive atmosphere and coordinate and plan improvements. <h3>(2) Mutual performance monitoring:</h3> respondents described common processes to monitor others’ performance and provide feedback to improve performance through planned and ad hoc meetings. <h3>(3) Backup behavior:</h3> team members worked together to shift workloads when sensing burden among other team members, often in other roles. <h3>(4) Adaptability:</h3> respondents described localized adaptations to adjust team member routines to serve patients’ behavioral health facilitated by operational freedom to fit their context. <h3>(5) Team orientation:</h3> respondents described shared overall goals of CIBH+ and describe ability to share information, take into account multiple views, and strategize together to deliver timely needed care to patients. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> CIBH+ team members described components that support effective teamwork but could benefit from planned information sharing, role clarification, and adaptation strategies. Thoughtful team-based approaches, when used, were helpful to implementing IBH. Formalized team processes could strengthen CIBH+ team function, though busy primary care practices may have limited capacity to address teamwork.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.