Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics

<h3>Context:</h3> Medication review is an essential part of most office visits. <h3>Objective:</h3> We aimed to compare medication review activities between private and public clinics. <h3>Study Design:</h3> Survey of medication review activities after primary care visits. <h3>Setting:</h3> One private primary care clinic and two clinics of a safety net hospital system that serves inner-city populations with significant socio-economic challenges. <h3>Population:</h3> Primary care visits by patients 55 years or older, taking 5 or more chronic medications, speaking English or Spanish during April through December 2023. <h3>Instrument:</h3> A published medication review form completed by prescribing clinicians to identify medication related safety issues and regimen changes. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Regimen changes and medication related safety issues. <h3>Results:</h3> Medication review forms were collected for 103 and 302 visits in private and public clinics, respectively. The patients in the public clinics were younger (71[64;76] vs 61[56; 67] years old), more likely to be Black/African American (50.0 vs 35.4%) and less likely Hispanic (20.7 vs 41.1%) background. The patients had similar levels of education (less than high school 30.2 vs 28.2%), numbers of prescription medications (6[5;9] vs 6 [5;8]), and prevalent conditions requiring medications, including hypertension (81.5 vs 88.3%), high cholesterol (65.9 vs 64.1%), and pain (55.6 vs 48.5%). The patients in the public clinic were less likely to have insurance for medications (77.4 vs 96.1%). Medication changes occurred much more frequently in public clinics (odds ratio 11.1[6.3-25.0]), including new (25.5 vs 6.8%), extending (17.5 vs 1.9%), and discontinuing prescriptions (16.9 vs 1.9%). Medication related safety issues were much more likely identified in visits at public clinics (odds ratio 12.5[5.6-33.3], including those with regimens (35.1 vs 2.1%), self-management (21.3 vs 3.9%), communication (13.0 vs 4.9%), and discrepancies (19.9 vs 2.9%). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The amount of medication review activities was much higher in visits at public clinics compared with those at a private clinic. Public clinics were 10 times more likely to have medication changes and to encounter medication safety issues during visits for 55+ year old patients with 5 or more prescription medications. Time-motion studies and fee-for-service payment in primary care should consider the profound impact of practice settings influenced by insurance coverage and social determinants.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6430
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics

Somer Blair, Kimberly G. Fulda, Yan Xiao, Richard A. Young
The Annals of Family Medicine
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Intensity of medication review activities in private and public clinics

Somer Blair, Kimberly G. Fulda, Yan Xiao, Richard A. Young
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Medication review is an essential part of most office visits. <h3>Objective:</h3> We aimed to compare medication review activities between private and public clinics. <h3>Study Design:</h3> Survey of medication review activities after primary care visits. <h3>Setting:</h3> One private primary care clinic and two clinics of a safety net hospital system that serves inner-city populations with significant socio-economic challenges. <h3>Population:</h3> Primary care visits by patients 55 years or older, taking 5 or more chronic medications, speaking English or Spanish during April through December 2023. <h3>Instrument:</h3> A published medication review form completed by prescribing clinicians to identify medication related safety issues and regimen changes. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Regimen changes and medication related safety issues. <h3>Results:</h3> Medication review forms were collected for 103 and 302 visits in private and public clinics, respectively. The patients in the public clinics were younger (71[64;76] vs 61[56; 67] years old), more likely to be Black/African American (50.0 vs 35.4%) and less likely Hispanic (20.7 vs 41.1%) background. The patients had similar levels of education (less than high school 30.2 vs 28.2%), numbers of prescription medications (6[5;9] vs 6 [5;8]), and prevalent conditions requiring medications, including hypertension (81.5 vs 88.3%), high cholesterol (65.9 vs 64.1%), and pain (55.6 vs 48.5%). The patients in the public clinic were less likely to have insurance for medications (77.4 vs 96.1%). Medication changes occurred much more frequently in public clinics (odds ratio 11.1[6.3-25.0]), including new (25.5 vs 6.8%), extending (17.5 vs 1.9%), and discontinuing prescriptions (16.9 vs 1.9%). Medication related safety issues were much more likely identified in visits at public clinics (odds ratio 12.5[5.6-33.3], including those with regimens (35.1 vs 2.1%), self-management (21.3 vs 3.9%), communication (13.0 vs 4.9%), and discrepancies (19.9 vs 2.9%). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The amount of medication review activities was much higher in visits at public clinics compared with those at a private clinic. Public clinics were 10 times more likely to have medication changes and to encounter medication safety issues during visits for 55+ year old patients with 5 or more prescription medications. Time-motion studies and fee-for-service payment in primary care should consider the profound impact of practice settings influenced by insurance coverage and social determinants.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.