Optimizing participation in the OECD PaRIS Project: Lessons learned in Saskatchewan

<h3>Context:</h3> Leading the OECD PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan (SK) was an integrated primary care collaborative team consisting of primary care providers (PCPs), people with lived experience (PWLE) aka patients, health system partners and researchers. <h3>Objective:</h3> To describe the recruitment strategies and key lessons from the engagement of PCPs and PWLE that participated in the PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> A participatory approach to cross-sectional surveys was facilitated through the building and nurturing of relationships based on trust and transparency with all members of the research team. Descriptive and inferential statistics were undertaken. <h3>Setting:</h3> Primary care clinics across Saskatchewan. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Eligibility criteria involved PCPs (family physicians and/or nurse practitioners) who facilitated a panel of patients; and PWLE who were 45 years of age or older, with or without a chronic condition, and who had documented appointments with an eligible PCP in the past six months. <h3>Instrument:</h3> Survey developed and approved by the OECD-PaRIS Working Group. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). <h3>Results:</h3> Fifty healthcare providers from 10 different practices resulted in 1,324 returned surveys (50 from PCPs; 1,274 from PWLE) within 4-months (July to October 2023). Recruitment success was built on integrating PCPs, as co-researchers, into the process. This relationship-driven approach was facilitated by: attending and participating in events attended by PCPs; invited luncheon meetings re: implementing PaRIS into practice; engaging clinic administrators; recognizing data ownership; creating a feedback loop; and, centering the perspectives of the PWLE in the recruitment/engagement processes. Recruitment opportunities for improvement were: survey length; language complexity; technical complexity; lack of time to build relationships with Indigenous peoples; and, the additional responsibility placed on providers to facilitate recruitment of PWLE. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study revealed recruitment strategies and insights gained from engaging PCPs and PWLE into the PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan. The results/findings underscore the effectiveness of participatory strategies in engaging/recruiting participants for PREMS and PROMS, highlighting the importance of early engagement, fostering trusting relationships, and acknowledging data ownership.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6560
Primary Topic
Social Sciences and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing participation in the OECD PaRIS Project: Lessons learned in Saskatchewan

Vivian R. Ramsden, Brenda Andreas, Udoka Okpalauwaekwe, Rachel Vanneste et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Social Sciences and Governance
article

Optimizing participation in the OECD PaRIS Project: Lessons learned in Saskatchewan

Vivian R. Ramsden, Brenda Andreas, Udoka Okpalauwaekwe, Rachel Vanneste, Ginger Ruddy, Melanie Warken, Aubrey Tollefson
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Leading the OECD PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan (SK) was an integrated primary care collaborative team consisting of primary care providers (PCPs), people with lived experience (PWLE) aka patients, health system partners and researchers. <h3>Objective:</h3> To describe the recruitment strategies and key lessons from the engagement of PCPs and PWLE that participated in the PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> A participatory approach to cross-sectional surveys was facilitated through the building and nurturing of relationships based on trust and transparency with all members of the research team. Descriptive and inferential statistics were undertaken. <h3>Setting:</h3> Primary care clinics across Saskatchewan. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> Eligibility criteria involved PCPs (family physicians and/or nurse practitioners) who facilitated a panel of patients; and PWLE who were 45 years of age or older, with or without a chronic condition, and who had documented appointments with an eligible PCP in the past six months. <h3>Instrument:</h3> Survey developed and approved by the OECD-PaRIS Working Group. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). <h3>Results:</h3> Fifty healthcare providers from 10 different practices resulted in 1,324 returned surveys (50 from PCPs; 1,274 from PWLE) within 4-months (July to October 2023). Recruitment success was built on integrating PCPs, as co-researchers, into the process. This relationship-driven approach was facilitated by: attending and participating in events attended by PCPs; invited luncheon meetings re: implementing PaRIS into practice; engaging clinic administrators; recognizing data ownership; creating a feedback loop; and, centering the perspectives of the PWLE in the recruitment/engagement processes. Recruitment opportunities for improvement were: survey length; language complexity; technical complexity; lack of time to build relationships with Indigenous peoples; and, the additional responsibility placed on providers to facilitate recruitment of PWLE. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> This study revealed recruitment strategies and insights gained from engaging PCPs and PWLE into the PaRIS Project in Saskatchewan. The results/findings underscore the effectiveness of participatory strategies in engaging/recruiting participants for PREMS and PROMS, highlighting the importance of early engagement, fostering trusting relationships, and acknowledging data ownership.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social Sciences and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.