Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Training in Shared Decision-Making Based on Reflexivity Strategies

<h3>Introduction:</h3> Reflexivity-based training for healthcare professionals on shared decision-making (SDM) fosters critical thinking, encouraging reflection on one’s personal values while supporting patient needs. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing SDM training that used reflexivity strategies in the context of trisomies’ screening. <h3>Methods:</h3> We performed a qualitative descriptive study. Based on a non-probabilistic recruitment approach, we aimed to recruit 20 prenatal service managers across the province of Quebec for 40- to 60-minute semi-structured interviews. Interviews were to be transcribed anonymously with NVivo Pro software and classified using themes identified from the Regmi and Jones Framework (2020). Deductive analysis was performed, with new themes added in the analysis as they emerged. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guideline. <h3>Results:</h3> Sixteen managers from 14 prenatal services participated. Among them, 56.3% were nurses, 87.5% were women, and 37.5% had a master’s degree. Participants mentioned that the current organizational context is the main challenge for integrating such training into Quebec9s healthcare system. However, the format of the training, online and asynchronous, coupled with learners9 existing technological competence due to pandemic-related experiences, were cited as facilitators for prenatal services to overcome the organizational barriers. Additionally, the diverse profiles and positive reputation of developers, learners9 motivation, and the relevance of training themes were perceived as significant facilitators. Depending on the type of healthcare professional, some liked the reflexivity exercises while others found them challenging. <h3>Discussion:</h3> Quebec9s current organizational context presents obstacles to integrating reflexivity-based training into prenatal services, but existing resources and strategies could be marshalled to overcome these challenges. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> This study is the first to document facilitators and barriers in implementing an online SDM training incorporating reflexivity strategies. Future research could involve comparative analyses among different professional groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6614
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Training in Shared Decision-Making Based on Reflexivity Strategies

France Légaré, Georgina Suélène Dofara, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Ndeye Thiab Diouf
The Annals of Family Medicine
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Training in Shared Decision-Making Based on Reflexivity Strategies

France Légaré, Georgina Suélène Dofara, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Ndeye Thiab Diouf
article en

Abstract

<h3>Introduction:</h3> Reflexivity-based training for healthcare professionals on shared decision-making (SDM) fosters critical thinking, encouraging reflection on one’s personal values while supporting patient needs. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing SDM training that used reflexivity strategies in the context of trisomies’ screening. <h3>Methods:</h3> We performed a qualitative descriptive study. Based on a non-probabilistic recruitment approach, we aimed to recruit 20 prenatal service managers across the province of Quebec for 40- to 60-minute semi-structured interviews. Interviews were to be transcribed anonymously with NVivo Pro software and classified using themes identified from the Regmi and Jones Framework (2020). Deductive analysis was performed, with new themes added in the analysis as they emerged. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guideline. <h3>Results:</h3> Sixteen managers from 14 prenatal services participated. Among them, 56.3% were nurses, 87.5% were women, and 37.5% had a master’s degree. Participants mentioned that the current organizational context is the main challenge for integrating such training into Quebec9s healthcare system. However, the format of the training, online and asynchronous, coupled with learners9 existing technological competence due to pandemic-related experiences, were cited as facilitators for prenatal services to overcome the organizational barriers. Additionally, the diverse profiles and positive reputation of developers, learners9 motivation, and the relevance of training themes were perceived as significant facilitators. Depending on the type of healthcare professional, some liked the reflexivity exercises while others found them challenging. <h3>Discussion:</h3> Quebec9s current organizational context presents obstacles to integrating reflexivity-based training into prenatal services, but existing resources and strategies could be marshalled to overcome these challenges. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> This study is the first to document facilitators and barriers in implementing an online SDM training incorporating reflexivity strategies. Future research could involve comparative analyses among different professional groups.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.