Virtual Visits in Prenatal Care: Benefits/Limitations, Uptake, and Patient Perceptions

<h3>Context:</h3> Prenatal care can be difficult for patients to accomplish, with frequent visits and time-sensitive health screenings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many clinics shifted to a virtual visit format. It is pertinent to evaluate whether virtual visits continue to have a role in prenatal care, particularly when socio-economic barriers impede attendance of in-person visits. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To examine socio-economic barriers to prenatal care and discern whether virtual visits alleviate such barriers. <h3>Study Design &amp; Analysis:</h3> Mixed-methods, retrospective-prospective cohort study. Non-parametric statistics including chi-square and Mann-Whitney U to compare cohorts. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Chart reviews from an urban safety-net clinic in Anchorage, AK comparing pre-pandemic, during-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts. Patient interviews, providing qualitative information to augment study findings. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> 25 randomly selected patients who delivered in 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort), 25 in 2021 (during-pandemic cohort), and 15 patients recruited in 2022-23 (post-pandemic study cohort). <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Optional virtual prenatal visits. Semi-structured interviews of post-partum patients. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Number of recommended visits, number of visits attended, percentage of recommended visits attended, visit type, prenatal care milestone completion, socioeconomic factors. <h3>Results:</h3> Patients faced greater socioeconomic barriers during the pandemic than pre-pandemic; these barriers increased still further in the post-pandemic period. Despite this, patient-initiated uptake of virtual visits was low post-pandemic. Interviews indicated that patients facing barriers to in-person visits would accept virtual visits if proactively offered by the clinic at the time of missed visits. In-person visits are preferred by patients, however, because of the direct interaction with their providers. Multiple patients also mentioned the importance of a clinic social worker in helping them overcome barriers to care. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> In-person visits remain the preferred option, not only from a medical standpoint, but also because of the interpersonal interaction that such visits provide, including interdisciplinary care from other team members such as a social worker. However, virtual visits were utilized when circumstances prevented in-person visits, and patients welcomed a more pro-active approach from the clinic in scheduling virtual visits in those circumstances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6551
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Visits in Prenatal Care: Benefits/Limitations, Uptake, and Patient Perceptions

Tonya Roberts, Cory Lutgen, Elisabeth Callen, Elise Robertson et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Virtual Visits in Prenatal Care: Benefits/Limitations, Uptake, and Patient Perceptions

Tonya Roberts, Cory Lutgen, Elisabeth Callen, Elise Robertson, Allene Whitney, Breeta Oxnard, Payton Bjorkman
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Prenatal care can be difficult for patients to accomplish, with frequent visits and time-sensitive health screenings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many clinics shifted to a virtual visit format. It is pertinent to evaluate whether virtual visits continue to have a role in prenatal care, particularly when socio-economic barriers impede attendance of in-person visits. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To examine socio-economic barriers to prenatal care and discern whether virtual visits alleviate such barriers. <h3>Study Design &amp; Analysis:</h3> Mixed-methods, retrospective-prospective cohort study. Non-parametric statistics including chi-square and Mann-Whitney U to compare cohorts. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Chart reviews from an urban safety-net clinic in Anchorage, AK comparing pre-pandemic, during-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts. Patient interviews, providing qualitative information to augment study findings. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> 25 randomly selected patients who delivered in 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort), 25 in 2021 (during-pandemic cohort), and 15 patients recruited in 2022-23 (post-pandemic study cohort). <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Optional virtual prenatal visits. Semi-structured interviews of post-partum patients. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Number of recommended visits, number of visits attended, percentage of recommended visits attended, visit type, prenatal care milestone completion, socioeconomic factors. <h3>Results:</h3> Patients faced greater socioeconomic barriers during the pandemic than pre-pandemic; these barriers increased still further in the post-pandemic period. Despite this, patient-initiated uptake of virtual visits was low post-pandemic. Interviews indicated that patients facing barriers to in-person visits would accept virtual visits if proactively offered by the clinic at the time of missed visits. In-person visits are preferred by patients, however, because of the direct interaction with their providers. Multiple patients also mentioned the importance of a clinic social worker in helping them overcome barriers to care. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> In-person visits remain the preferred option, not only from a medical standpoint, but also because of the interpersonal interaction that such visits provide, including interdisciplinary care from other team members such as a social worker. However, virtual visits were utilized when circumstances prevented in-person visits, and patients welcomed a more pro-active approach from the clinic in scheduling virtual visits in those circumstances.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.