Virtual Visits in Prenatal Care: Benefits/Limitations, Uptake, and Patient Perceptions
<h3>Context:</h3> Prenatal care can be difficult for patients to accomplish, with frequent visits and time-sensitive health screenings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many clinics shifted to a virtual visit format. It is pertinent to evaluate whether virtual visits continue to have a role in prenatal care, particularly when socio-economic barriers impede attendance of in-person visits. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To examine socio-economic barriers to prenatal care and discern whether virtual visits alleviate such barriers. <h3>Study Design & Analysis:</h3> Mixed-methods, retrospective-prospective cohort study. Non-parametric statistics including chi-square and Mann-Whitney U to compare cohorts. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Chart reviews from an urban safety-net clinic in Anchorage, AK comparing pre-pandemic, during-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts. Patient interviews, providing qualitative information to augment study findings. <h3>Population Studied:</h3> 25 randomly selected patients who delivered in 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort), 25 in 2021 (during-pandemic cohort), and 15 patients recruited in 2022-23 (post-pandemic study cohort). <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Optional virtual prenatal visits. Semi-structured interviews of post-partum patients. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Number of recommended visits, number of visits attended, percentage of recommended visits attended, visit type, prenatal care milestone completion, socioeconomic factors. <h3>Results:</h3> Patients faced greater socioeconomic barriers during the pandemic than pre-pandemic; these barriers increased still further in the post-pandemic period. Despite this, patient-initiated uptake of virtual visits was low post-pandemic. Interviews indicated that patients facing barriers to in-person visits would accept virtual visits if proactively offered by the clinic at the time of missed visits. In-person visits are preferred by patients, however, because of the direct interaction with their providers. Multiple patients also mentioned the importance of a clinic social worker in helping them overcome barriers to care. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> In-person visits remain the preferred option, not only from a medical standpoint, but also because of the interpersonal interaction that such visits provide, including interdisciplinary care from other team members such as a social worker. However, virtual visits were utilized when circumstances prevented in-person visits, and patients welcomed a more pro-active approach from the clinic in scheduling virtual visits in those circumstances.
Authors
- Tonya Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-2632)
- Cory Lutgen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-4557)
- Elisabeth Callen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-2428)
- Elise Robertson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7255-8829)
- Allene Whitney
- Breeta Oxnard
- Payton Bjorkman
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2024-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6551
- Primary Topic
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00