Facilitating Well-Being in Primary Healthcare During COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review

<h3>Context:</h3> The COVID-19 pandemic increased critical levels of turnover of healthcare workers in interdisciplinary primary healthcare (PHC) teams, including family physicians, nurses, social workers, and others. Maintaining well-being - “the presence of positive physical, mental, social, and integrated health in connection with activities and environments that allow development across personal and work-life domains" - of the PHC workforce is imperative for facilitating effective care. While improving provider well-being has been identified as a promising adjunct to existing interventions based on burnout reduction, specific facilitators of well-being in pandemic contexts are unknown. <h3>Objectives:</h3> i) Identify individual, organization, and/or systemic facilitators of PHC provider well-being relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic context, ii) Collect and summarize well-being facilitators amendable to actioning by PHC providers, leaders, administrators, and policymakers during and following the COVID-19 pandemic. <h3>Study Design:</h3> Rapid Systematic Review <h3>Data Sources:</h3> CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from January 1st, 2020 (indicating their data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic) to July 1st, 2023 (date of review completion). Studies in exclusively PHC settings exploring well-being and related positive outcomes (e.g., resilience) for fully licensed providers were included. <h3>Results:</h3> We retrieved 1910 records; 195 studies were reviewed in full. Only three non-controlled studies (62 total participants) met our eligibility criteria. Narrative synthesis of study qualitative and quantitative outcomes yielded three recommendations: 1) prioritize organizational supports as central to provider well-being, 2) cultivate positive patient relationships to facilitate provider well-being, and 3) develop a shared framework for understanding the well-being of PHC providers. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Our findings support the necessity of organizational- and system-level, theory-driven interventions to facilitate PHC provider well-being during pandemics. The limited number of studies identified demonstrated the need for explicitly facilitating PHC’s participation in this research. That use of even a moderately stringent definition of well-being yielded few results indicates the continued dominance of deficit-mitigating, versus positivity-enabling, research and highlights the necessity of developing consensus definitions to facilitate future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6920
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating Well-Being in Primary Healthcare During COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review

Rachelle Ashcroft, Peter Sheffield, Jennifer Rayner, Jori Jones
The Annals of Family Medicine
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Facilitating Well-Being in Primary Healthcare During COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review

Rachelle Ashcroft, Peter Sheffield, Jennifer Rayner, Jori Jones
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> The COVID-19 pandemic increased critical levels of turnover of healthcare workers in interdisciplinary primary healthcare (PHC) teams, including family physicians, nurses, social workers, and others. Maintaining well-being - “the presence of positive physical, mental, social, and integrated health in connection with activities and environments that allow development across personal and work-life domains" - of the PHC workforce is imperative for facilitating effective care. While improving provider well-being has been identified as a promising adjunct to existing interventions based on burnout reduction, specific facilitators of well-being in pandemic contexts are unknown. <h3>Objectives:</h3> i) Identify individual, organization, and/or systemic facilitators of PHC provider well-being relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic context, ii) Collect and summarize well-being facilitators amendable to actioning by PHC providers, leaders, administrators, and policymakers during and following the COVID-19 pandemic. <h3>Study Design:</h3> Rapid Systematic Review <h3>Data Sources:</h3> CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from January 1st, 2020 (indicating their data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic) to July 1st, 2023 (date of review completion). Studies in exclusively PHC settings exploring well-being and related positive outcomes (e.g., resilience) for fully licensed providers were included. <h3>Results:</h3> We retrieved 1910 records; 195 studies were reviewed in full. Only three non-controlled studies (62 total participants) met our eligibility criteria. Narrative synthesis of study qualitative and quantitative outcomes yielded three recommendations: 1) prioritize organizational supports as central to provider well-being, 2) cultivate positive patient relationships to facilitate provider well-being, and 3) develop a shared framework for understanding the well-being of PHC providers. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Our findings support the necessity of organizational- and system-level, theory-driven interventions to facilitate PHC provider well-being during pandemics. The limited number of studies identified demonstrated the need for explicitly facilitating PHC’s participation in this research. That use of even a moderately stringent definition of well-being yielded few results indicates the continued dominance of deficit-mitigating, versus positivity-enabling, research and highlights the necessity of developing consensus definitions to facilitate future research.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.