Increasing primary care capacity by adding team members

<h3>Context</h3> Over 6.5 million adults in Canada do not have a family doctor or nurse practitioner. Interprofessional team-based care can expand access to primary care, however, the relationship between interprofessional teams and their impact on primary care capacity is not well-understood. <h3>Objective</h3> To discover what is known in the literature about whether and how interprofessional primary care teams can impact the “capacity” (ability of the most-responsible clinician to serve more patients). <h3>Study Design</h3> Rapid scoping review. Teams were defined as at least one most-responsible clinician and one regulated health professional working together on an ongoing basis with shared patients. <h3>Setting</h3> Primary care teams in high income countries <h3>Population Studied</h3> Study selection was limited to the peer-reviewed literature examining the impact of interprofessional primary care teams on the most-responsible clinician’s capacity. Studies that were qualitative, published before 2000, or non-English were excluded. Intervention (if appropriate): N/A <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> The main outcome of interest was a quantitative assessment of the capacity of the most responsible clinician(s) on the team. Secondary outcomes of interest were provider experience, health outcomes and cost of care, which were extracted only from studies that reported the primary outcome. <h3>Results</h3> The search strategy resulted in 35 relevant studies. Results demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in measuring capacity of the most-responsible clinician. There was substantial variation in: patient populations served; the team size and composition; comparator groups; physician payment models; team governance and culture of teamwork; types of health professionals and their roles and ratios; and the total basket of services provided. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our study highlights the need for extensive further research in order to elucidate the mechanisms through which interprofessional teams facilitate or optimize primary care capacity, and the patient populations who may be best served by the different team configurations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.7038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increasing primary care capacity by adding team members

Paul A. Khan, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Rachel Thelen, Jane Zhao et al.
1 citations
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
0.85
article

Increasing primary care capacity by adding team members

Paul A. Khan, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Rachel Thelen, Jane Zhao, Hina Ansari, Tara Kiran, Noah Ivers, Danielle Martin, Simon H. S. Pearce, Andrea C. Tricco, Lyn M. Sibley, Vera Nincic, CG Carter, Dipika Neupane, Kanya L Rajendra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Context</h3> Over 6.5 million adults in Canada do not have a family doctor or nurse practitioner. Interprofessional team-based care can expand access to primary care, however, the relationship between interprofessional teams and their impact on primary care capacity is not well-understood. <h3>Objective</h3> To discover what is known in the literature about whether and how interprofessional primary care teams can impact the “capacity” (ability of the most-responsible clinician to serve more patients). <h3>Study Design</h3> Rapid scoping review. Teams were defined as at least one most-responsible clinician and one regulated health professional working together on an ongoing basis with shared patients. <h3>Setting</h3> Primary care teams in high income countries <h3>Population Studied</h3> Study selection was limited to the peer-reviewed literature examining the impact of interprofessional primary care teams on the most-responsible clinician’s capacity. Studies that were qualitative, published before 2000, or non-English were excluded. Intervention (if appropriate): N/A <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> The main outcome of interest was a quantitative assessment of the capacity of the most responsible clinician(s) on the team. Secondary outcomes of interest were provider experience, health outcomes and cost of care, which were extracted only from studies that reported the primary outcome. <h3>Results</h3> The search strategy resulted in 35 relevant studies. Results demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in measuring capacity of the most-responsible clinician. There was substantial variation in: patient populations served; the team size and composition; comparator groups; physician payment models; team governance and culture of teamwork; types of health professionals and their roles and ratios; and the total basket of services provided. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our study highlights the need for extensive further research in order to elucidate the mechanisms through which interprofessional teams facilitate or optimize primary care capacity, and the patient populations who may be best served by the different team configurations.

Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.