Clinical outcomes of administering an ePROM of barriers to adherence to ART to people with HIV through a patient portal

<h3>Context:</h3> Adherence to antiretrovirals (ART) by people with HIV (PWH) is crucial, however, many face obstacles that go undiscussed with health professionals. We used the patient portal (Opal) to administer the I-Score, a 7-item electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) of barriers to ART adherence. <h3>Objective:</h3> To describe patient and service-related outcomes of the I-Score intervention and outline adherence barrier management by physicians. <h3>Study Design Analysis:</h3> 6-month one-arm implementation pilot study. <h3>Setting:</h3> A hospital-based clinic in Montreal, Canada. <h3>Population:</h3> Adult PWH on ART, speaking French or English, owning a smartphone, willing to use the patient portal, with a history of adherence issues. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Patients completed the I-Score on the patient portal up to two days before visits with their physician at Baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). We collected patients’ sociodemographic information at T1, and HIV viral loads at T1 and T3. At each visit, patients reported ART adherence, and physicians completed a checklist of actions undertaken based on I-Score results. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient outcomes at T1 and T3, included HIV viral load undetectability, mean scores for self-reported adherence (score of 1 to 5) and adherence barriers (score of 1 to 10) over the past month. For service outcomes, we report frequencies and proportions of clinical visits where physicians took actions based on I-Score results. <h3>Results:</h3> Out of 26/32 participants who completed the intervention, 11/26 (42%) were female; 14/26 (54%) aged ≥ 50 years; and 8/26 (31%) had an income below $19,999. Most patients (23/26) had an undetectable viral load at T1 and T3. Concerning domains of adherence barriers, mean scores decreased for: Thoughts/Feelings (T1=2.9/10 to T3=2.3/10), Habits/Activities (1.8;1.7), Medication (2.1;1.5), and Health (2.0;1.3), but increased for: Social (2.5;2.9) and Economic Situation (2.4;2.6), and Care (1.3;1.4). Average self-reported adherence increased from T1 (4.11) to T3 (4.19). Physicians ordered new tests for 10/26 (38%) patients, changed the medication plan of 7/26 (27%) patients, and referred14/26 (54%) patients to a specialist. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Administering the I-Score on a patient portal is feasible and appears to improve patient and service outcomes, yet with slight fluctuations. Further research is recommended for a more robust understanding of its efficacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6883
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of administering an ePROM of barriers to adherence to ART to people with HIV through a patient portal

David Lessard, Kim Engler, Bertrand Lebouché, Alexandra de Pokomandy et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Clinical outcomes of administering an ePROM of barriers to adherence to ART to people with HIV through a patient portal

David Lessard, Kim Engler, Bertrand Lebouché, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Tarek Hijal, Cecilia T. Costiniuk, Ashkan Baradaran, Joseph Cox, MHD Amir Chalati, Yuanchao
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Adherence to antiretrovirals (ART) by people with HIV (PWH) is crucial, however, many face obstacles that go undiscussed with health professionals. We used the patient portal (Opal) to administer the I-Score, a 7-item electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) of barriers to ART adherence. <h3>Objective:</h3> To describe patient and service-related outcomes of the I-Score intervention and outline adherence barrier management by physicians. <h3>Study Design Analysis:</h3> 6-month one-arm implementation pilot study. <h3>Setting:</h3> A hospital-based clinic in Montreal, Canada. <h3>Population:</h3> Adult PWH on ART, speaking French or English, owning a smartphone, willing to use the patient portal, with a history of adherence issues. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Patients completed the I-Score on the patient portal up to two days before visits with their physician at Baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). We collected patients’ sociodemographic information at T1, and HIV viral loads at T1 and T3. At each visit, patients reported ART adherence, and physicians completed a checklist of actions undertaken based on I-Score results. <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Patient outcomes at T1 and T3, included HIV viral load undetectability, mean scores for self-reported adherence (score of 1 to 5) and adherence barriers (score of 1 to 10) over the past month. For service outcomes, we report frequencies and proportions of clinical visits where physicians took actions based on I-Score results. <h3>Results:</h3> Out of 26/32 participants who completed the intervention, 11/26 (42%) were female; 14/26 (54%) aged ≥ 50 years; and 8/26 (31%) had an income below $19,999. Most patients (23/26) had an undetectable viral load at T1 and T3. Concerning domains of adherence barriers, mean scores decreased for: Thoughts/Feelings (T1=2.9/10 to T3=2.3/10), Habits/Activities (1.8;1.7), Medication (2.1;1.5), and Health (2.0;1.3), but increased for: Social (2.5;2.9) and Economic Situation (2.4;2.6), and Care (1.3;1.4). Average self-reported adherence increased from T1 (4.11) to T3 (4.19). Physicians ordered new tests for 10/26 (38%) patients, changed the medication plan of 7/26 (27%) patients, and referred14/26 (54%) patients to a specialist. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Administering the I-Score on a patient portal is feasible and appears to improve patient and service outcomes, yet with slight fluctuations. Further research is recommended for a more robust understanding of its efficacy.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.