"Investigating White Culture": a Phenomenological Study on How Culture Shapes Behavioral Health Processes in Primary Care

<h3>Context:</h3> Integrated Primary Care (IPC) has increased due to increased demand for behavioral health services. Researchers have sought to develop culturally sensitive approaches in IPC to meet behavioral and socioeconomic needs of racially and ethnically marginalized populations, who are overrepresented in behavioral health diagnoses and underrepresented in services in the US. However, which approaches are optimal remains unknown. Further, culture in the context of IPC and how cultural context shapes behavioral health processes is understudied. <h3>Objective:</h3> Thus, we explored how Behavioral Health Consultants (BHCs) defined culture and how it shaped screening, assessment, and treatment of behavioral health conditions in racially and ethnically marginalized patients in IPC settings. <h3>Design/Instrument:</h3> This qualitative phenomenological study included piloted semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14, with researchers using reflexivity to identify, process, and bracket biases and preconceived notions. <h3>Setting/Population:</h3> Data were collected from IPC sites with an assigned BHC and support personnel. IRB-approved materials were used to recruit volunteers. Respondents were four BHCs at three IPC sites. <h3>Outcome Measure:</h3> The outcome was the lived experiences of how culture influenced screening, assessment, and treatment. <h3>Results:</h3> Seven themes were identified: Eurocentrism-Americanism, cultural alignment, structural inequity, patient-first wellness-centered approach, cultural framework, relationship dynamics, and systemic outlook. White, cisgender, male, heteronormativity was described as a philosophy and framework in assessing behavioral health conditions in IPC. Universal screening tools were contributors to disparities in identifying, diagnosing, and treating behavioral health concerns in racially and ethnically marginalized populations. A person-centered approach and cultural humility were described as essential in building rapport to learn about patients’ cultures and adapt existing approaches to increase engagement and improve clinical outcomes. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> To promote equity and improve total health outcomes, a multilevel approach is required to decolonize behavioral health practices in IPC. Research is needed to identify and measure a culturally-sensitive and responsive framework in IPC to improve total health outcomes by tailoring behavioral health screening, assessment, and treatment for racially and ethnically marginalized populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6884
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Investigating White Culture": a Phenomenological Study on How Culture Shapes Behavioral Health Processes in Primary Care

Stephen D. Gill, Carine Kambou, Brooke Mauriello
The Annals of Family Medicine
Community Health and Development
article

"Investigating White Culture": a Phenomenological Study on How Culture Shapes Behavioral Health Processes in Primary Care

Stephen D. Gill, Carine Kambou, Brooke Mauriello
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Integrated Primary Care (IPC) has increased due to increased demand for behavioral health services. Researchers have sought to develop culturally sensitive approaches in IPC to meet behavioral and socioeconomic needs of racially and ethnically marginalized populations, who are overrepresented in behavioral health diagnoses and underrepresented in services in the US. However, which approaches are optimal remains unknown. Further, culture in the context of IPC and how cultural context shapes behavioral health processes is understudied. <h3>Objective:</h3> Thus, we explored how Behavioral Health Consultants (BHCs) defined culture and how it shaped screening, assessment, and treatment of behavioral health conditions in racially and ethnically marginalized patients in IPC settings. <h3>Design/Instrument:</h3> This qualitative phenomenological study included piloted semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14, with researchers using reflexivity to identify, process, and bracket biases and preconceived notions. <h3>Setting/Population:</h3> Data were collected from IPC sites with an assigned BHC and support personnel. IRB-approved materials were used to recruit volunteers. Respondents were four BHCs at three IPC sites. <h3>Outcome Measure:</h3> The outcome was the lived experiences of how culture influenced screening, assessment, and treatment. <h3>Results:</h3> Seven themes were identified: Eurocentrism-Americanism, cultural alignment, structural inequity, patient-first wellness-centered approach, cultural framework, relationship dynamics, and systemic outlook. White, cisgender, male, heteronormativity was described as a philosophy and framework in assessing behavioral health conditions in IPC. Universal screening tools were contributors to disparities in identifying, diagnosing, and treating behavioral health concerns in racially and ethnically marginalized populations. A person-centered approach and cultural humility were described as essential in building rapport to learn about patients’ cultures and adapt existing approaches to increase engagement and improve clinical outcomes. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> To promote equity and improve total health outcomes, a multilevel approach is required to decolonize behavioral health practices in IPC. Research is needed to identify and measure a culturally-sensitive and responsive framework in IPC to improve total health outcomes by tailoring behavioral health screening, assessment, and treatment for racially and ethnically marginalized populations.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.