Enhancing Provider Confidence in Communicating with Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) through Patient Letters

<h3>Context</h3> Effective communication with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) is a significant challenge in healthcare, often leading to poorer health outcomes and patient dissatisfaction. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to assess healthcare providers9 confidence and practices in using patient letters to communicate with patients with LEP, enhance communication strategies, and improve health outcomes. <h3>Study Design</h3> A cross-sectional survey was conducted using REDCap to collect quantitative and qualitative data from healthcare providers. The survey included questions on demographics, physician confidence, communication practices, and challenges. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software v10, employing paired t-tests to compare confidence and evaluation levels across different demographics and practice settings. <h3>Setting/Dataset</h3> The study was conducted within the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC), encompassing primary care and other subspecialties. <h3>Population Studied</h3> The survey targeted healthcare providers within UVMMC, with a response rate of 46 out of 252 (18.25%) for invited participants. The sample included providers varying across gender, experience, department, and technological expertise. <h3>Intervention/Instrument</h3> Data were collected via a structured REDCap survey. <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> The primary outcome measures were providers9 self-reported confidence levels in communicating through letters to patients with LEP and ensuring patient comprehension. Secondary measures included the identification of common challenges and preferred methods of communication with patients with LEP. <h3>Results</h3> The study revealed gaps in healthcare providers9 familiarity and confidence when communicating via patient letters to patients with LEP. Confidence levels among providers were significantly lower when addressing patients with LEP compared to interactions with general patient populations, and this was consistent regardless of the frequency of interaction with patients with LEP. Providers agreed there was difficulty in patient comprehension, time constraints, limited cultural understanding, and lack of access. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The findings suggest a need for improved training, resources, and formal communication strategies to improve provider confidence and effectiveness in communicating with patients with LEP. By addressing challenges and leveraging specific communication methods, healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.7151
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Provider Confidence in Communicating with Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) through Patient Letters

Jonathan Chen, Garrett Wu, Marie Sandoval
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Enhancing Provider Confidence in Communicating with Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) through Patient Letters

Jonathan Chen, Garrett Wu, Marie Sandoval
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context</h3> Effective communication with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) is a significant challenge in healthcare, often leading to poorer health outcomes and patient dissatisfaction. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to assess healthcare providers9 confidence and practices in using patient letters to communicate with patients with LEP, enhance communication strategies, and improve health outcomes. <h3>Study Design</h3> A cross-sectional survey was conducted using REDCap to collect quantitative and qualitative data from healthcare providers. The survey included questions on demographics, physician confidence, communication practices, and challenges. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software v10, employing paired t-tests to compare confidence and evaluation levels across different demographics and practice settings. <h3>Setting/Dataset</h3> The study was conducted within the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC), encompassing primary care and other subspecialties. <h3>Population Studied</h3> The survey targeted healthcare providers within UVMMC, with a response rate of 46 out of 252 (18.25%) for invited participants. The sample included providers varying across gender, experience, department, and technological expertise. <h3>Intervention/Instrument</h3> Data were collected via a structured REDCap survey. <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> The primary outcome measures were providers9 self-reported confidence levels in communicating through letters to patients with LEP and ensuring patient comprehension. Secondary measures included the identification of common challenges and preferred methods of communication with patients with LEP. <h3>Results</h3> The study revealed gaps in healthcare providers9 familiarity and confidence when communicating via patient letters to patients with LEP. Confidence levels among providers were significantly lower when addressing patients with LEP compared to interactions with general patient populations, and this was consistent regardless of the frequency of interaction with patients with LEP. Providers agreed there was difficulty in patient comprehension, time constraints, limited cultural understanding, and lack of access. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The findings suggest a need for improved training, resources, and formal communication strategies to improve provider confidence and effectiveness in communicating with patients with LEP. By addressing challenges and leveraging specific communication methods, healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.