Cities and Their People: Dwelling in the Anthropic Time of N. K. Jemisin’s New York

The article starts with Martin Heidegger’s 1951 essay “Bauen Wohnen Denken,” recently rethought by Jeff Malpas in his book Rethinking Dwelling from today’s perspective of urban and metropolitan dwelling. However, while defining dwelling relationally, the Australian philosopher still thinks about the human as a being-in-place in a traditional, human-centred way. Thus he overlooks how tightly humans are entangled with more-than-humans: with biological, geological, and technological entities and agencies. For this reason, the article tackles a further rethinking of dwelling beyond human sociality, or even queering it beyond binary thinking to better depict what it proposes to call urban subjectivity. Reading N. K. Jemisin’s recent novel duology The Great Cities, the article argues that urban subjectivity is a distributed phenomenon, which both incorporates and elaborates on more-than-human elements. In so doing, urban subjects share a sociality not only with the animal and geological but also with technological forces and their territorial exorganic functions as an agency of anti-entropic locality (Bernard Stiegler’s “anthropic life”). Thus, creatively approached technology as a pharmakonian form of organogenesis and Derridian différance may help us keep the entropic and neganthropic forces in balance, as pertinently demonstrated in Jemisin’s duology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Text Matters
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.14.09
Primary Topic
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cities and Their People: Dwelling in the Anthropic Time of N. K. Jemisin’s New York

Małgorzata Sugiera
Text Matters
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
article

Cities and Their People: Dwelling in the Anthropic Time of N. K. Jemisin’s New York

Małgorzata Sugiera
article en

Abstract

The article starts with Martin Heidegger’s 1951 essay “Bauen Wohnen Denken,” recently rethought by Jeff Malpas in his book Rethinking Dwelling from today’s perspective of urban and metropolitan dwelling. However, while defining dwelling relationally, the Australian philosopher still thinks about the human as a being-in-place in a traditional, human-centred way. Thus he overlooks how tightly humans are entangled with more-than-humans: with biological, geological, and technological entities and agencies. For this reason, the article tackles a further rethinking of dwelling beyond human sociality, or even queering it beyond binary thinking to better depict what it proposes to call urban subjectivity. Reading N. K. Jemisin’s recent novel duology The Great Cities, the article argues that urban subjectivity is a distributed phenomenon, which both incorporates and elaborates on more-than-human elements. In so doing, urban subjects share a sociality not only with the animal and geological but also with technological forces and their territorial exorganic functions as an agency of anti-entropic locality (Bernard Stiegler’s “anthropic life”). Thus, creatively approached technology as a pharmakonian form of organogenesis and Derridian différance may help us keep the entropic and neganthropic forces in balance, as pertinently demonstrated in Jemisin’s duology.

Text Matters(14)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.