A combined DEAV-BWM approach for effective evaluation and ranking of biomass materials in charcoal briquette production

The utilization of agricultural waste for producing charcoal briquettes is gaining significant attention as a sustainable alternative energy source. Converting these residues into charcoal briquettes not only addresses energy shortages but also provides an efficient solution for managing agricultural waste, contributing to environmental sustainability. This study proposes a novel methodology integrating a Data Envelopment Analysis Variant (DEAV) with the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to assess and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production. The DEAV-BWM model enhances the evaluation process by considering multiple criteria simultaneously and incorporating both efficiency and consensus among different evaluation methods. The key highlights of the methodology are as follows:•A novel method, called the DEAV model, for evaluating efficiency scores has been established, incorporating both Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) concepts.•This paper introduces a novel hybrid method that combines the DEAV model with the BWM to evaluate and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production, enhancing the reliability and robustness of the decision-making process.•The proposed method can be adapted and applied to other areas of biomass utilization and beyond, providing a versatile tool for researchers and practitioners in the field of sustainable energy, engineering, and operations research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103075
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A combined DEAV-BWM approach for effective evaluation and ranking of biomass materials in charcoal briquette production

Atchara Choompol, Narong Wichapa, Pariwat Nasawat, Nattapat Kanchanaruangrong
3 citations
MethodsX
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
1.47
article

A combined DEAV-BWM approach for effective evaluation and ranking of biomass materials in charcoal briquette production

Atchara Choompol, Narong Wichapa, Pariwat Nasawat, Nattapat Kanchanaruangrong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The utilization of agricultural waste for producing charcoal briquettes is gaining significant attention as a sustainable alternative energy source. Converting these residues into charcoal briquettes not only addresses energy shortages but also provides an efficient solution for managing agricultural waste, contributing to environmental sustainability. This study proposes a novel methodology integrating a Data Envelopment Analysis Variant (DEAV) with the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to assess and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production. The DEAV-BWM model enhances the evaluation process by considering multiple criteria simultaneously and incorporating both efficiency and consensus among different evaluation methods. The key highlights of the methodology are as follows:•A novel method, called the DEAV model, for evaluating efficiency scores has been established, incorporating both Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) concepts.•This paper introduces a novel hybrid method that combines the DEAV model with the BWM to evaluate and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production, enhancing the reliability and robustness of the decision-making process.•The proposed method can be adapted and applied to other areas of biomass utilization and beyond, providing a versatile tool for researchers and practitioners in the field of sustainable energy, engineering, and operations research.

MethodsXVol. 13
Kalasin University (TH), Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.