Assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews with meta-analysis about clinical pharmacy services: A sensitivity analysis of AMSTAR-2

Most SRMAs on clinical pharmacy services were classified as low or critically low quality and modifying the AMSTAR-2 domain criticality did not improve these assessments. Researchers, journal editors, and peer reviewers must work to enhance SRMAs quality, which are crucial for providing robust evidence for pharmaceutical services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.11.002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews with meta-analysis about clinical pharmacy services: A sensitivity analysis of AMSTAR-2

Fernando Fernández-Llimós, Inajara Rotta, J Diniz
3 citations
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
article

Assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews with meta-analysis about clinical pharmacy services: A sensitivity analysis of AMSTAR-2

Fernando Fernández-Llimós, Inajara Rotta, J Diniz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Most SRMAs on clinical pharmacy services were classified as low or critically low quality and modifying the AMSTAR-2 domain criticality did not improve these assessments. Researchers, journal editors, and peer reviewers must work to enhance SRMAs quality, which are crucial for providing robust evidence for pharmaceutical services.

Research in Social and Administrative PharmacyVol. 21(2)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.