Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law

Abstract Judicial independence is essential for ensuring effective judicial protection in each Member State, and becomes an EU-wide concern primarily due to the principle of mutual trust which presumes functional equivalence between Member States as regards their respective legal systems in general and the safeguarding of fundamental rights in particular. As a principle of EU law, it is for the CJEU to determine the contours of judicial independence. National judges as a category of persons have a unique role in furthering EU integration thanks to the principles of direct effect and supremacy of EU law as well as the dialogue with the CJEU in Art. 267 TFEU. This in turn exposes them to greater threats from the executive and legislature when the rule of law is undermined. For these reasons, this paper discusses the rationale and mechanisms for recognising a subjective right of judges to their independence, adding a further tool for guaranteeing the rule of law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liverpool Law Review
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-024-09376-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law

Ruairi O’Neill
1 citations
Liverpool Law Review
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
2.23
article

Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law

Ruairi O’Neill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Judicial independence is essential for ensuring effective judicial protection in each Member State, and becomes an EU-wide concern primarily due to the principle of mutual trust which presumes functional equivalence between Member States as regards their respective legal systems in general and the safeguarding of fundamental rights in particular. As a principle of EU law, it is for the CJEU to determine the contours of judicial independence. National judges as a category of persons have a unique role in furthering EU integration thanks to the principles of direct effect and supremacy of EU law as well as the dialogue with the CJEU in Art. 267 TFEU. This in turn exposes them to greater threats from the executive and legislature when the rule of law is undermined. For these reasons, this paper discusses the rationale and mechanisms for recognising a subjective right of judges to their independence, adding a further tool for guaranteeing the rule of law.

Liverpool Law ReviewVol. 46(1)
University of Warsaw (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law — Ruairi O’Neill · Liverpool Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS