Evaluation of IMERG climate trends over land in the TRMM and GPM eras

Abstract The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for global precipitation measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) is a global precipitation product suite consisting of both near-real-time and research-grade products with high spatiotemporal resolution. However, the IMERG developers note that it is designed as a high resolution precipitation product (HRPP), not a Climate Data Record, and its ability to capture climate trends remains uncertain. Therefore, it is imperative to explore and quantify IMERG’s capability in capturing climate trends for our community. This study examines the climatological performance of IMERG Final (Version 06) by analyzing annual precipitation trends over land from 2001 to 2019 using the Mann-Kendall analysis, taking gauge records as ground truth. Three different matching strategies are applied: at gauge locations, at 0.1° pixels, and at 1.0° pixels. Additionally, this study compares the performances during the TRMM (2001–2014) and GPM eras (2015–2019). Our results find: (1) IMERG daily data exhibits high spatial consistency with gauge records at both gauge locations and 0.1° resolution, consistent with its Global Precipitation Climatology Centre calibration, with a conversion rate of approximately 89.3%; (2) IMERG performs much better overall in the GPM era than in the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) era, evidenced by a lower proportion of unreliable samples (∼10.2% vs. ∼21.2%); (3) The proportion of samples showing consistent trends with gauge data is 86.7% in the GPM era, much higher than the 70.5% and 75.3% shown by the entire record and the TRMM era, respectively. This improvement in the GPM era suggests that the within-mission consistency of IMERG is higher than the between-mission consistency, likely due to residual differences in the calibration methods used during the TRMM and GPM missions. This study broadens the perspective on IMERG, showcasing its additional potential for analyzing climate trends despite its design only as a HRPP. Crucially, it highlights and reconfirms how the GPM era has enhanced IMERG’s capacity for accurately tracking global precipitation trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad984e
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of IMERG climate trends over land in the TRMM and GPM eras

Mengye Chen, S. Ferraro, Yang Hong, Yixin Wen et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
2.40
article

Evaluation of IMERG climate trends over land in the TRMM and GPM eras

Mengye Chen, S. Ferraro, Yang Hong, Yixin Wen, Siyu Zhu, Zhong Liu, Zhi Li, George J. Huffman, Theresa E. Tsoodle, Yuzhou Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for global precipitation measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) is a global precipitation product suite consisting of both near-real-time and research-grade products with high spatiotemporal resolution. However, the IMERG developers note that it is designed as a high resolution precipitation product (HRPP), not a Climate Data Record, and its ability to capture climate trends remains uncertain. Therefore, it is imperative to explore and quantify IMERG’s capability in capturing climate trends for our community. This study examines the climatological performance of IMERG Final (Version 06) by analyzing annual precipitation trends over land from 2001 to 2019 using the Mann-Kendall analysis, taking gauge records as ground truth. Three different matching strategies are applied: at gauge locations, at 0.1° pixels, and at 1.0° pixels. Additionally, this study compares the performances during the TRMM (2001–2014) and GPM eras (2015–2019). Our results find: (1) IMERG daily data exhibits high spatial consistency with gauge records at both gauge locations and 0.1° resolution, consistent with its Global Precipitation Climatology Centre calibration, with a conversion rate of approximately 89.3%; (2) IMERG performs much better overall in the GPM era than in the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) era, evidenced by a lower proportion of unreliable samples (∼10.2% vs. ∼21.2%); (3) The proportion of samples showing consistent trends with gauge data is 86.7% in the GPM era, much higher than the 70.5% and 75.3% shown by the entire record and the TRMM era, respectively. This improvement in the GPM era suggests that the within-mission consistency of IMERG is higher than the between-mission consistency, likely due to residual differences in the calibration methods used during the TRMM and GPM missions. This study broadens the perspective on IMERG, showcasing its additional potential for analyzing climate trends despite its design only as a HRPP. Crucially, it highlights and reconfirms how the GPM era has enhanced IMERG’s capacity for accurately tracking global precipitation trends.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(1)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), George Mason University (US), University of Florida (US), NOAA National Weather Service (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.