A greener Green Belt? Co-developing exploratory scenarios for contentious peri-urban landscapes

• Stakeholders were split on the scale of development in future Green Belts. • Multifunctional scenario perceived as most benefits, likely and preferred. • Scenarios show possible tensions and trade-offs between ecosystem services. • AI tools were effective for creating scenario landscape visualisations. • More strategic, holistic and integrated governance is needed for multifunctionality. Peri-urban landscapes experience conflicting land-use demands from co-occurring urban–rural drivers. In England, Green Belts are urban containment policies which impact on the peri -urban in isolation from the wider landscapes they cover. Green Belts’ endurance in planning policy have resulted in a contentious and politicised policy arena, under significant scrutiny. Whilst research has shown heterogeneous supplies of ecosystem services existing in Green Belts, it is unclear how and whether Green Belts as landscapes may change in the future beyond their urban containment bounds. Though participatory scenarios have been extensively applied to landscape planning, they have not to English Green Belts. Addressing these gaps, a cross-sector stakeholder workshop was held to co-develop exploratory Green Belt landscape scenarios nationally in 20 years’ time. Three scenarios: “Intensify & Diversify”, “Build-Build-Build” and “Multifunctional” were framed on a governance-functionality axis, identifying future drivers, impacts and assumptions. The scenarios reveal Green Belts are under increased pressure from multiple land-uses, societal demands, and policies, many of which are in conflict, stemming from either a prioritisation or balancing of these demands through varying governance mechanisms. Stakeholder critiques and visions reveal a substantial cross-sector consensus for more (multi)functional Green Belts in England, including as “strategic urban support landscapes” to adapt and mitigate threats associated with climate change. Finally, complementary landscape photo-visualisations of “fictitious” landscapes were produced, aided by artificial intelligence, highlighting the growing potential of these tools to support landscape research. This use of fictional landscapes extends the applicability of our results to peri -urban areas experiencing comparable contexts and drivers, such as Western and Northern European regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105268
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A greener Green Belt? Co-developing exploratory scenarios for contentious peri-urban landscapes

Claire Walsh, Alister Scott, Matthew Kirby
9 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.54
article

A greener Green Belt? Co-developing exploratory scenarios for contentious peri-urban landscapes

Claire Walsh, Alister Scott, Matthew Kirby
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Stakeholders were split on the scale of development in future Green Belts. • Multifunctional scenario perceived as most benefits, likely and preferred. • Scenarios show possible tensions and trade-offs between ecosystem services. • AI tools were effective for creating scenario landscape visualisations. • More strategic, holistic and integrated governance is needed for multifunctionality. Peri-urban landscapes experience conflicting land-use demands from co-occurring urban–rural drivers. In England, Green Belts are urban containment policies which impact on the peri -urban in isolation from the wider landscapes they cover. Green Belts’ endurance in planning policy have resulted in a contentious and politicised policy arena, under significant scrutiny. Whilst research has shown heterogeneous supplies of ecosystem services existing in Green Belts, it is unclear how and whether Green Belts as landscapes may change in the future beyond their urban containment bounds. Though participatory scenarios have been extensively applied to landscape planning, they have not to English Green Belts. Addressing these gaps, a cross-sector stakeholder workshop was held to co-develop exploratory Green Belt landscape scenarios nationally in 20 years’ time. Three scenarios: “Intensify & Diversify”, “Build-Build-Build” and “Multifunctional” were framed on a governance-functionality axis, identifying future drivers, impacts and assumptions. The scenarios reveal Green Belts are under increased pressure from multiple land-uses, societal demands, and policies, many of which are in conflict, stemming from either a prioritisation or balancing of these demands through varying governance mechanisms. Stakeholder critiques and visions reveal a substantial cross-sector consensus for more (multi)functional Green Belts in England, including as “strategic urban support landscapes” to adapt and mitigate threats associated with climate change. Finally, complementary landscape photo-visualisations of “fictitious” landscapes were produced, aided by artificial intelligence, highlighting the growing potential of these tools to support landscape research. This use of fictional landscapes extends the applicability of our results to peri -urban areas experiencing comparable contexts and drivers, such as Western and Northern European regions.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 255
Northumbria University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.