Native for a Day: Non‐Native Perceptions of Native American Life

Social science research about non‐Native attitudes and beliefs about Native Americans (NA) shows that stereotypes are widely endorsed and that their racist content has changed little from the original imperial conception of “the Indian” described in critical historiography and Native studies. What we understand less is how non‐Natives understand NA in relation to the self and how this relationship might reproduce or challenge racial hierarchy. We explored attitudes toward NA among a multi‐racial sample from Arizona using a perspective‐taking exercise, asking interviewees, “If you were to become a Native American person for just a few days, how do you think your life would be different?” Responses expressed stereotypes , recognition of discrimination , and claims of sameness. Stereotypes reflect an endorsement of both negative and positive stereotypes of NA by interviewees. Recognition of discrimination reflects participants' awareness of inequality in the experiences and circumstances of NA relative to non‐NA. Claims of sameness reflect colorblind views of NA. We demonstrate perspective‐taking questions as useful for the sociology of the self and other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Inquiry
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12645
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Native for a Day: Non‐Native Perceptions of Native American Life

Monica McDermott, Levin Elias Welch
Sociological Inquiry
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Native for a Day: Non‐Native Perceptions of Native American Life

Monica McDermott, Levin Elias Welch
article en

Abstract

Social science research about non‐Native attitudes and beliefs about Native Americans (NA) shows that stereotypes are widely endorsed and that their racist content has changed little from the original imperial conception of “the Indian” described in critical historiography and Native studies. What we understand less is how non‐Natives understand NA in relation to the self and how this relationship might reproduce or challenge racial hierarchy. We explored attitudes toward NA among a multi‐racial sample from Arizona using a perspective‐taking exercise, asking interviewees, “If you were to become a Native American person for just a few days, how do you think your life would be different?” Responses expressed stereotypes , recognition of discrimination , and claims of sameness. Stereotypes reflect an endorsement of both negative and positive stereotypes of NA by interviewees. Recognition of discrimination reflects participants' awareness of inequality in the experiences and circumstances of NA relative to non‐NA. Claims of sameness reflect colorblind views of NA. We demonstrate perspective‐taking questions as useful for the sociology of the self and other.

Sociological InquiryVol. 95(4)
Arizona State University (US)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Native for a Day: Non‐Native Perceptions of Native American Life — Monica McDermott, Levin Elias Welch · Sociological Inquiry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS