Conserving liberalism within values education

This article underscores the importance of contextualization when analysing values education. The interplay between societal values and those imparted within an educational context significantly affect the interpretation and comprehension of values education. To address this concern, I strategically position sociologist Tiffany Mary Jones framework, ‘The Four Orientations Framework,’ within Swedish context. The critical examination of Jones’ framework and subsequent applications, reveals that these approaches do not fully capture the complex relationship between societal values and values education. Thereafter, three constructive conclusions emerge in response to this initial critique. Firstly, an argument arises for untangling values from function during the analysis of values education. Second, the function of values education is determined by the relation between societal values and the values conveyed within education. Lastly, I emphasize the importance of recognizing and navigating dissonance within and between different value systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2024.2433007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Values and Moral Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conserving liberalism within values education

Mimmi Norgren Hansson
1 citations
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Values and Moral Education
2.10
article

Conserving liberalism within values education

Mimmi Norgren Hansson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article underscores the importance of contextualization when analysing values education. The interplay between societal values and those imparted within an educational context significantly affect the interpretation and comprehension of values education. To address this concern, I strategically position sociologist Tiffany Mary Jones framework, ‘The Four Orientations Framework,’ within Swedish context. The critical examination of Jones’ framework and subsequent applications, reveals that these approaches do not fully capture the complex relationship between societal values and values education. Thereafter, three constructive conclusions emerge in response to this initial critique. Firstly, an argument arises for untangling values from function during the analysis of values education. Second, the function of values education is determined by the relation between societal values and the values conveyed within education. Lastly, I emphasize the importance of recognizing and navigating dissonance within and between different value systems.

British Journal of Sociology of EducationVol. 46(1)
Umeå University (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Values and Moral Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conserving liberalism within values education — Mimmi Norgren Hansson · British Journal of Sociology of Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS