Pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Social distance and self-assessment of scientific skills

The social distance scale developed by Bogardus decades ago, which allows us to measure levels of acceptance among members of diverse social, ethnic, or racial groups, has been widely used in different contexts. The objective of this study is to evaluate the social distance accepted by pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Following the principle of the Bogardus scale, a questionnaire was created regarding different degrees of closeness. Respondents also completed a scientific skills self-assessment. The population consisted of 193 people who declared themselves in favor of vaccination and 41 people who declared themselves against it. Statistical tests show significant differences regarding the acceptance of the out-group; the anti-vaccine group expressed less prejudice toward the pro-vaccine group than the pro group did toward the anti group. No difference is noted in the self-assessment of scientific skills. The results are discussed with regard to elements of the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Behavioral and Health Sciences
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5590/jsbhs.2024.18.1.18
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Social distance and self-assessment of scientific skills

Sandrine Gaymard
Journal of Social Behavioral and Health Sciences
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Social distance and self-assessment of scientific skills

Sandrine Gaymard
article en

Abstract

The social distance scale developed by Bogardus decades ago, which allows us to measure levels of acceptance among members of diverse social, ethnic, or racial groups, has been widely used in different contexts. The objective of this study is to evaluate the social distance accepted by pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Following the principle of the Bogardus scale, a questionnaire was created regarding different degrees of closeness. Respondents also completed a scientific skills self-assessment. The population consisted of 193 people who declared themselves in favor of vaccination and 41 people who declared themselves against it. Statistical tests show significant differences regarding the acceptance of the out-group; the anti-vaccine group expressed less prejudice toward the pro-vaccine group than the pro group did toward the anti group. No difference is noted in the self-assessment of scientific skills. The results are discussed with regard to elements of the literature.

Journal of Social Behavioral and Health SciencesVol. 18(1)
Université d'Angers (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups. Social distance and self-assessment of scientific skills — Sandrine Gaymard · Journal of Social Behavioral and Health Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS