Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence

<h3>Context:</h3> Concerns about family practice are well-founded, but also negatively biased. This can fuel poor impressions among medical students and dispirit practicing family physicians. <h3>Objective:</h3> Give a balanced description of family medicine and family practice, including positive evidence that is lacking in the public narrative. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Descriptive analysis. Pan-Canadian results based on most recent data. <h3>Datasets:</h3> Datasets from the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC), Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS), Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Canadian Medical Association (CMA), and College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). <h3>Population Studied and Instruments:</h3> Medical students, family medicine (FM) residents, and practicing physicians in all provinces and territories. The AFMC surveys all graduating medical students in Canada (1,838 responses and response rate of 60% in 2022). CaRMS covers all residency programs in Canada (2,937 applicants in 2023). The CMA’s National Physician Health Survey (NPHS) is an open-link survey with 3,489 responses from practicing physicians in 2021. CIHI’s National Physician Database (NPDB) contains fee-for-service billing data for all physicians in Canada (269 million services in 2021). The CFPC Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey (FMLS) includes all second-year family medicine residents (53% response rate in 2022). <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Medical student and FM residents9 perceptions and career choices; practicing physicians9 health, satisfaction, and scope of practice. <h3>Results:</h3> 42% of graduating medical students rate their FM experiences as being “excellent”, compared to an average of 30% for other disciplines. Medical students who choose FM are highly successful in the CaRMS match; for 80% FM is their top-ranked discipline and 98% match in the first iteration. The NPHS shows that 81% of GPs have high emotional well-being, compared to 78% of medical specialists and 75% of surgical specialists. The NPDB shows that family physicians practice in broad areas; they account for 52% of all medical services, including 47% of psychotherapy counselling, 49% of hospital-based assessments, and 21% of anesthesia services. The FMLS shows that 90% of FM residents are proud to become family physicians and 98% feel they make valuable contributions. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> A more positive, balanced, and evidence-based story can and should be told about FM and family practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6718
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence

Steve Slade, Lorelei Nardi
The Annals of Family Medicine
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence

Steve Slade, Lorelei Nardi
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> Concerns about family practice are well-founded, but also negatively biased. This can fuel poor impressions among medical students and dispirit practicing family physicians. <h3>Objective:</h3> Give a balanced description of family medicine and family practice, including positive evidence that is lacking in the public narrative. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Descriptive analysis. Pan-Canadian results based on most recent data. <h3>Datasets:</h3> Datasets from the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC), Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS), Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Canadian Medical Association (CMA), and College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). <h3>Population Studied and Instruments:</h3> Medical students, family medicine (FM) residents, and practicing physicians in all provinces and territories. The AFMC surveys all graduating medical students in Canada (1,838 responses and response rate of 60% in 2022). CaRMS covers all residency programs in Canada (2,937 applicants in 2023). The CMA’s National Physician Health Survey (NPHS) is an open-link survey with 3,489 responses from practicing physicians in 2021. CIHI’s National Physician Database (NPDB) contains fee-for-service billing data for all physicians in Canada (269 million services in 2021). The CFPC Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey (FMLS) includes all second-year family medicine residents (53% response rate in 2022). <h3>Outcome Measures:</h3> Medical student and FM residents9 perceptions and career choices; practicing physicians9 health, satisfaction, and scope of practice. <h3>Results:</h3> 42% of graduating medical students rate their FM experiences as being “excellent”, compared to an average of 30% for other disciplines. Medical students who choose FM are highly successful in the CaRMS match; for 80% FM is their top-ranked discipline and 98% match in the first iteration. The NPHS shows that 81% of GPs have high emotional well-being, compared to 78% of medical specialists and 75% of surgical specialists. The NPDB shows that family physicians practice in broad areas; they account for 52% of all medical services, including 47% of psychotherapy counselling, 49% of hospital-based assessments, and 21% of anesthesia services. The FMLS shows that 90% of FM residents are proud to become family physicians and 98% feel they make valuable contributions. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> A more positive, balanced, and evidence-based story can and should be told about FM and family practice.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Canadian Medical Association (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.