An umbrella review of mHealth tool implementation strategies: a 6-step guide to optimize patient, caregiver and clinician use

<h3>Context:</h3> mHealth refers to the use of mobile and wireless technologies to support the achievement of health objectives. Targeted users of mHealth tools include clinicians, patients, and caregivers. In clinical settings, uptake of mHealth tools has varied, with limited use explained, in part, by suboptimal adaptation of the tool and the implementation processes. <h3>Objectives:</h3> 1) Understand how to influence mHealth tool use among patients, caregivers, and clinicians, 2) Develop mHealth tool implementation guidance. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Umbrella review with qualitative synthesis. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Literature reviews (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) identified through a librarian-assisted data base search. Two independent reviewers selected publications about strategies, recommendations, facilitators, or barriers of mHealth tool implementation in OECD countries. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Data describing factors that influence clinician and patient/caregiver use of mHealth tools were extracted. A thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Effective Practice and Organization of Care strategies was conducted. <h3>Results:</h3> From the 8244 records identified, 201 were selected for full text reading. Ultimately, the synthesis included 29 reviews (16 systematic, 10 scoping, 1 rapid, 2 other). They addressed mHealth tools in general (n=17), patient portals (n=6), electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (n=5), or chatbots (n=1), from the perspectives of patient/caregiver users (n=14), clinician users (n=5), or both (n=10). The synthesis culminated in 6 iterative implementation steps: Collaborate with interested parties; Adapt the tool to address user needs and preferences; Plan how mHealth tool use will integrate into user routines; Provide ongoing training and technical support; Promote the tool; Evaluate the implementation and revisit previous steps as needed. Strategies to operationalize each step are described. The importance of each step for increasing mHealth tool use among patients, caregivers, and clinicians is explained. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Results provide a comprehensive process to adapt and implement mHealth tools in clinical settings. The rationale for each implementation step highlight why each step is crucial to the implementation success. The resulting interactive mHealth implementation guide, replete with detailed examples, can be a valuable resource to integrate mHealth into clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6708
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An umbrella review of mHealth tool implementation strategies: a 6-step guide to optimize patient, caregiver and clinician use

Kim Engler, Bertrand Lebouché, Paula Louise Bush, Dominic Chu et al.
The Annals of Family Medicine
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

An umbrella review of mHealth tool implementation strategies: a 6-step guide to optimize patient, caregiver and clinician use

Kim Engler, Bertrand Lebouché, Paula Louise Bush, Dominic Chu, Sonia Lussier, Tracie Barnett
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context:</h3> mHealth refers to the use of mobile and wireless technologies to support the achievement of health objectives. Targeted users of mHealth tools include clinicians, patients, and caregivers. In clinical settings, uptake of mHealth tools has varied, with limited use explained, in part, by suboptimal adaptation of the tool and the implementation processes. <h3>Objectives:</h3> 1) Understand how to influence mHealth tool use among patients, caregivers, and clinicians, 2) Develop mHealth tool implementation guidance. <h3>Study Design and Analysis:</h3> Umbrella review with qualitative synthesis. <h3>Setting or Dataset:</h3> Literature reviews (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) identified through a librarian-assisted data base search. Two independent reviewers selected publications about strategies, recommendations, facilitators, or barriers of mHealth tool implementation in OECD countries. <h3>Intervention/Instrument:</h3> Data describing factors that influence clinician and patient/caregiver use of mHealth tools were extracted. A thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Effective Practice and Organization of Care strategies was conducted. <h3>Results:</h3> From the 8244 records identified, 201 were selected for full text reading. Ultimately, the synthesis included 29 reviews (16 systematic, 10 scoping, 1 rapid, 2 other). They addressed mHealth tools in general (n=17), patient portals (n=6), electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (n=5), or chatbots (n=1), from the perspectives of patient/caregiver users (n=14), clinician users (n=5), or both (n=10). The synthesis culminated in 6 iterative implementation steps: Collaborate with interested parties; Adapt the tool to address user needs and preferences; Plan how mHealth tool use will integrate into user routines; Provide ongoing training and technical support; Promote the tool; Evaluate the implementation and revisit previous steps as needed. Strategies to operationalize each step are described. The importance of each step for increasing mHealth tool use among patients, caregivers, and clinicians is explained. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Results provide a comprehensive process to adapt and implement mHealth tools in clinical settings. The rationale for each implementation step highlight why each step is crucial to the implementation success. The resulting interactive mHealth implementation guide, replete with detailed examples, can be a valuable resource to integrate mHealth into clinical practice.

The Annals of Family MedicineVol. 22(Supplement 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.