Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines

• We engaged both parents and staff to understand barriers to ECE enrollment. • We used peer researchers and human-centered design methods. • We identified novel barriers related to outmoded technology. • Peer researchers cocreated eight novel policy/ system solutions for ECE enrollment. Numerous studies have examined the processes parents use in accessing early care and education (ECE) for their children and the barriers parents face to enroll. To our knowledge, previous studies have not engaged both parents and frontline ECE enrollment staff as co-investigators to examine family perspectives and a systems perspective simultaneously. This qualitative study compiled a research team of diverse (family, provider, academic) perspectives combining principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and human-centered design in peer-led qualitative interviews ( n = 20), focus groups ( n = 5) with local ECE staff and managers, and several community synthesis and design sessions ( n = 6) with caregivers, ECE staff, and local thought leaders in Cincinnati, Ohio. The goals of the study were to: 1) identify policy-relevant and system-level barriers that keep families with low incomes or families of color from enrolling in high-quality ECE programs and 2) co-design potential policy- and system-interventions or prototypes with parents and local ECE agency partners to overcome these barriers. Nine types of barriers in three categories were elucidated by parents and ECE staff: 1) enrollment barriers such as parents’ lack of awareness of options, excessive and redundant paperwork, outdated technologies used, and lack of transparency paired with poor follow-up communication from ECE staff; 2) practical and logistical barriers such as cost, transportation, and concerns about COVID; and 3) human-factors concerns related to safety, trust, and diversity of ECE environment. Peer researchers co-created eight policy- or system- prototypes or interventions to address these barriers. While our findings suggest that access challenges remain ubiquitous locally, they also demonstrate what is possible when researchers and policymakers intentionally involve targeted users of ECE policy in the designs of those policies and systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.11.007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines

Julietta Ladipo, D Bennett, Amy King, Kristen A. Copeland et al.
3 citations
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Educational and Psychological Assessments
2.37
article

Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines

Julietta Ladipo, D Bennett, Amy King, Kristen A. Copeland, Alexis Amsterdam, Heather Gerker
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• We engaged both parents and staff to understand barriers to ECE enrollment. • We used peer researchers and human-centered design methods. • We identified novel barriers related to outmoded technology. • Peer researchers cocreated eight novel policy/ system solutions for ECE enrollment. Numerous studies have examined the processes parents use in accessing early care and education (ECE) for their children and the barriers parents face to enroll. To our knowledge, previous studies have not engaged both parents and frontline ECE enrollment staff as co-investigators to examine family perspectives and a systems perspective simultaneously. This qualitative study compiled a research team of diverse (family, provider, academic) perspectives combining principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and human-centered design in peer-led qualitative interviews ( n = 20), focus groups ( n = 5) with local ECE staff and managers, and several community synthesis and design sessions ( n = 6) with caregivers, ECE staff, and local thought leaders in Cincinnati, Ohio. The goals of the study were to: 1) identify policy-relevant and system-level barriers that keep families with low incomes or families of color from enrolling in high-quality ECE programs and 2) co-design potential policy- and system-interventions or prototypes with parents and local ECE agency partners to overcome these barriers. Nine types of barriers in three categories were elucidated by parents and ECE staff: 1) enrollment barriers such as parents’ lack of awareness of options, excessive and redundant paperwork, outdated technologies used, and lack of transparency paired with poor follow-up communication from ECE staff; 2) practical and logistical barriers such as cost, transportation, and concerns about COVID; and 3) human-factors concerns related to safety, trust, and diversity of ECE environment. Peer researchers co-created eight policy- or system- prototypes or interventions to address these barriers. While our findings suggest that access challenges remain ubiquitous locally, they also demonstrate what is possible when researchers and policymakers intentionally involve targeted users of ECE policy in the designs of those policies and systems.

Early Childhood Research QuarterlyVol. 71
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Peak Parent Center (US), Impact (CA), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.