Industrial reform policies: does marketization enhance productivity more than privatization?

Abstract Placing state-owned firms into the private sector is understood to yield productivity gains, but this effect is seldom decomposed into changes in ownership (privatization) and changes in firm characteristics to match privately owned firms without changing ownership (marketization). This article presents an empirical assessment of Chinese firm-level data using a counterfactual design approach to identify if the Chinese ‘grasp the large and let go of the small’ industrial policy reform initiative reduced the efficiency gap between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises and whether any gains were associated with privatization or marketization. Our empirical results show that marketization was associated with stronger increases in productivity than was privatization, suggesting that industrial reforms should consolidate assets, enhance cash flows, and reduce the need for external liquidity rather than focusing on changing ownership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Economic Papers
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpae046
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial reform policies: does marketization enhance productivity more than privatization?

Simon Rudkin, Yang Chen, Don J. Webber, Ming He
3 citations
Oxford Economic Papers
Global trade and economics
2.49
article

Industrial reform policies: does marketization enhance productivity more than privatization?

Simon Rudkin, Yang Chen, Don J. Webber, Ming He
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Placing state-owned firms into the private sector is understood to yield productivity gains, but this effect is seldom decomposed into changes in ownership (privatization) and changes in firm characteristics to match privately owned firms without changing ownership (marketization). This article presents an empirical assessment of Chinese firm-level data using a counterfactual design approach to identify if the Chinese ‘grasp the large and let go of the small’ industrial policy reform initiative reduced the efficiency gap between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises and whether any gains were associated with privatization or marketization. Our empirical results show that marketization was associated with stronger increases in productivity than was privatization, suggesting that industrial reforms should consolidate assets, enhance cash flows, and reduce the need for external liquidity rather than focusing on changing ownership.

Oxford Economic PapersVol. 77(3)
University of Manchester (GB), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global trade and economics
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.