Effects of calcium and buffer sources on lactational performance, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and metabolism of dairy cows

The objective was to investigate the effects of calcium and rumen buffer sources on lactational performance, ruminal fermentation, enteric gas emissions, apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients, and blood variables of lactating dairy cows. A replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design experiment was conducted with 9 primi- and 9 multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows. Cows were fed the same basal diet, except for the inclusion (as % DMI) of the following minerals: (1) CON, 0.80% limestone and 0.55% NaCl; (2) BICARB, 0.80% limestone and 0.80% NaHCO<sub>3</sub>; and (3) ARAG, 0.80% aragonite and 0.55% NaCl. Dry matter intake was decreased by ARAG compared with CON but not with BICARB. Treatments did not affect milk yield, ECM, or yields of milk components. Feed efficiency was increased by BICARB compared with CON but not with ARAG (i.e., 1.72, 1.64, and 1.70, respectively). Compared with CON, milk fat was increased by both BICARB and ARAG (3.32% vs. 3.58%, respectively). Milk protein concentration tended to be slightly decreased (i.e., 2%) by ARAG compared with CON but not with BICARB. Milk total solids and MUN concentrations were increased by BICARB and tended to be increased by ARAG, compared with CON. Treatments did not affect ruminal fermentation variables, except that ARAG increased butyrate molar proportion, compared with CON but not with BICARB. Additionally, ruminal NH<sub>3</sub> concentration was greater for ARAG than for BICARB. Enteric gas emission and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients were not affected by treatments in the current study. Blood pH was not affected by treatments, and blood ionized Ca concentration was greater for ARAG than for BICARB, but neither was different from CON. Treatments did not affect plasma haptoglobin, β-hydroxybutyrate, or urea N concentrations. Overall, rumen buffering capacity of ARAG appears to be similar to that of BICARB, which was supported by increased milk fat, compared with CON. Compared with BICARB, ARAG increased ionized Ca concentration because of decreased base excess and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations in blood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25089
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of calcium and buffer sources on lactational performance, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and metabolism of dairy cows

Katiéli Caroline Welter, Jason Hart, L.F. Martins, S.F. Cueva et al.
Journal of Dairy Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Effects of calcium and buffer sources on lactational performance, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and metabolism of dairy cows

Katiéli Caroline Welter, Jason Hart, L.F. Martins, S.F. Cueva, N. Stepanchenko, A.N. Hristov, D.E. Wasson, J S Dowd
article en

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the effects of calcium and rumen buffer sources on lactational performance, ruminal fermentation, enteric gas emissions, apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients, and blood variables of lactating dairy cows. A replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design experiment was conducted with 9 primi- and 9 multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows. Cows were fed the same basal diet, except for the inclusion (as % DMI) of the following minerals: (1) CON, 0.80% limestone and 0.55% NaCl; (2) BICARB, 0.80% limestone and 0.80% NaHCO<sub>3</sub>; and (3) ARAG, 0.80% aragonite and 0.55% NaCl. Dry matter intake was decreased by ARAG compared with CON but not with BICARB. Treatments did not affect milk yield, ECM, or yields of milk components. Feed efficiency was increased by BICARB compared with CON but not with ARAG (i.e., 1.72, 1.64, and 1.70, respectively). Compared with CON, milk fat was increased by both BICARB and ARAG (3.32% vs. 3.58%, respectively). Milk protein concentration tended to be slightly decreased (i.e., 2%) by ARAG compared with CON but not with BICARB. Milk total solids and MUN concentrations were increased by BICARB and tended to be increased by ARAG, compared with CON. Treatments did not affect ruminal fermentation variables, except that ARAG increased butyrate molar proportion, compared with CON but not with BICARB. Additionally, ruminal NH<sub>3</sub> concentration was greater for ARAG than for BICARB. Enteric gas emission and apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients were not affected by treatments in the current study. Blood pH was not affected by treatments, and blood ionized Ca concentration was greater for ARAG than for BICARB, but neither was different from CON. Treatments did not affect plasma haptoglobin, β-hydroxybutyrate, or urea N concentrations. Overall, rumen buffering capacity of ARAG appears to be similar to that of BICARB, which was supported by increased milk fat, compared with CON. Compared with BICARB, ARAG increased ionized Ca concentration because of decreased base excess and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations in blood.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 107(12)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.