An Analysis of Variance of the Pantheon+ Dataset: Systematics in the Covariance Matrix?

We investigate the statistics of the available Pantheon+ dataset. Noticing that the χ2 value for the best-fit ΛCDM model to the real data is small, we quantify how significant its smallness is by calculating the distribution of χ2 values for the best-fit ΛCDM model fit to mock Pantheon+-like datasets, using the provided covariance matrix. We further investigate the distribution of the residuals of the Pantheon+ dataset with respect to the best-fit ΛCDM model, and notice that they scatter less than would be expected from the covariance matrix but find no significant kurtosis. These results point to the conclusion that the Pantheon+ covariance matrix is over-estimated. One simple interpretation of these results is a ∼7% overestimation of errors on SN distance moduli in Pantheon+ data. When the covariance matrix is reduced by subtracting an intrinsic scatter term from the diagonal terms of the covariance matrix, the best-fit χ2 for the ΛCDM model achieves a normal value of 1580 and no deviation from ΛCDM is detected. We further quantify how consistent the ΛCDM model is with respect to the modified data with the subtracted covariance matrix using model-independent reconstruction techniques such as the iterative smoothing method. We find that the standard model is consistent with the data. There are a number of potential explanations for this smallness of the χ2, such as a Malmquist bias at high redshift, or accounting for systematic uncertainties by adding them to the covariance matrix, thus approximating systematic uncertainties as statistical ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universe
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10120439
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Variance of the Pantheon+ Dataset: Systematics in the Covariance Matrix?

Ryan E. Keeley, Benjamin L’Huillier, Arman Shafieloo
5 citations
Universe
Cultural Differences and Values
3.22
article

An Analysis of Variance of the Pantheon+ Dataset: Systematics in the Covariance Matrix?

Ryan E. Keeley, Benjamin L’Huillier, Arman Shafieloo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We investigate the statistics of the available Pantheon+ dataset. Noticing that the χ2 value for the best-fit ΛCDM model to the real data is small, we quantify how significant its smallness is by calculating the distribution of χ2 values for the best-fit ΛCDM model fit to mock Pantheon+-like datasets, using the provided covariance matrix. We further investigate the distribution of the residuals of the Pantheon+ dataset with respect to the best-fit ΛCDM model, and notice that they scatter less than would be expected from the covariance matrix but find no significant kurtosis. These results point to the conclusion that the Pantheon+ covariance matrix is over-estimated. One simple interpretation of these results is a ∼7% overestimation of errors on SN distance moduli in Pantheon+ data. When the covariance matrix is reduced by subtracting an intrinsic scatter term from the diagonal terms of the covariance matrix, the best-fit χ2 for the ΛCDM model achieves a normal value of 1580 and no deviation from ΛCDM is detected. We further quantify how consistent the ΛCDM model is with respect to the modified data with the subtracted covariance matrix using model-independent reconstruction techniques such as the iterative smoothing method. We find that the standard model is consistent with the data. There are a number of potential explanations for this smallness of the χ2, such as a Malmquist bias at high redshift, or accounting for systematic uncertainties by adding them to the covariance matrix, thus approximating systematic uncertainties as statistical ones.

UniverseVol. 10(12)
University of California, Merced (US), Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KR), Sejong University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cultural Differences and Values
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.