Evaluating the Utility of ChatGPT in Diagnosing and Managing Maxillofacial Trauma

Maxillofacial trauma is a significant concern in emergency departments (EDs) due to its high prevalence and the complexity of its management. However, many ED physicians lack specialized training and confidence in handling these cases, leading to a high rate of facial trauma referrals and increased stress on consult services. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in large language models such as ChatGPT, have shown potential in aiding clinical decision-making. This study specifically examines the efficacy of ChatGPT in diagnosing and managing maxillofacial trauma. Ten clinical vignettes describing common facial trauma scenarios were presented to a group of plastic surgery residents from a tertiary care center and to ChatGPT. The chatbot and residents were asked to provide their diagnosis, ED management, and definitive management for each scenario. Responses were scored by attending plastic surgeons who were blinded to the response source. The study included 13 resident and ChatGPT responses. The mean total scores were similar between residents and ChatGPT (23.23 versus 22.77, P > 0.05). ChatGPT outperformed residents in diagnostic accuracy (9.85 versus 8.54, P < 0.001) but underperformed in definitive management (8.35 versus 6.35, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ED management scores between ChatGPT and the residents. ChatGPT demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing maxillofacial trauma. However, its ability to suggest appropriate ED management and definitive treatment plans was limited. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in ED settings, further advancements are necessary before it can reliably contribute to treatment planning in emergent maxillofacial clinical scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010931
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Utility of ChatGPT in Diagnosing and Managing Maxillofacial Trauma

Caroline Baker, Joseph A. Ricci, Evan Rothchild, Neil Tanna et al.
3 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
article

Evaluating the Utility of ChatGPT in Diagnosing and Managing Maxillofacial Trauma

Caroline Baker, Joseph A. Ricci, Evan Rothchild, Neil Tanna, Isabelle T. Smith
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Maxillofacial trauma is a significant concern in emergency departments (EDs) due to its high prevalence and the complexity of its management. However, many ED physicians lack specialized training and confidence in handling these cases, leading to a high rate of facial trauma referrals and increased stress on consult services. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in large language models such as ChatGPT, have shown potential in aiding clinical decision-making. This study specifically examines the efficacy of ChatGPT in diagnosing and managing maxillofacial trauma. Ten clinical vignettes describing common facial trauma scenarios were presented to a group of plastic surgery residents from a tertiary care center and to ChatGPT. The chatbot and residents were asked to provide their diagnosis, ED management, and definitive management for each scenario. Responses were scored by attending plastic surgeons who were blinded to the response source. The study included 13 resident and ChatGPT responses. The mean total scores were similar between residents and ChatGPT (23.23 versus 22.77, P > 0.05). ChatGPT outperformed residents in diagnostic accuracy (9.85 versus 8.54, P < 0.001) but underperformed in definitive management (8.35 versus 6.35, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ED management scores between ChatGPT and the residents. ChatGPT demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing maxillofacial trauma. However, its ability to suggest appropriate ED management and definitive treatment plans was limited. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in ED settings, further advancements are necessary before it can reliably contribute to treatment planning in emergent maxillofacial clinical scenarios.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(4)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Hofstra University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.