[Five myths about open science].

Open science aims to make research accessible to all, enhancing transparency and promoting replication. It involves practices such as open access publishing, sharing statistical code, and making non-sensitive data a available to encourage critical review, reduce errors and prevent selective reporting of favorable results. A key component of open science is preregistration, where researchers outline their hypotheses and planned analysis methods in advance, minimizing bias and promoting accountability. Despite its benefits, misconceptions about open science practices hinder its widespread adoption among researchers. Common myths include the belief that preregistration prevents any deviation from the original plan, that it only applies to clinical trials, or that it's unnecessary if data have already been collected. By challenging these misunderstandings, we can leverage open science practices to improve the integrity and quality of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-11-13
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Five myths about open science].

Lars‐Gunnar Gunnarsson, Robin Fondberg, Christian Rück
PubMed
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

[Five myths about open science].

Lars‐Gunnar Gunnarsson, Robin Fondberg, Christian Rück
article en

Abstract

Open science aims to make research accessible to all, enhancing transparency and promoting replication. It involves practices such as open access publishing, sharing statistical code, and making non-sensitive data a available to encourage critical review, reduce errors and prevent selective reporting of favorable results. A key component of open science is preregistration, where researchers outline their hypotheses and planned analysis methods in advance, minimizing bias and promoting accountability. Despite its benefits, misconceptions about open science practices hinder its widespread adoption among researchers. Common myths include the belief that preregistration prevents any deviation from the original plan, that it only applies to clinical trials, or that it's unnecessary if data have already been collected. By challenging these misunderstandings, we can leverage open science practices to improve the integrity and quality of research.

PubMedVol. 121
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

[Five myths about open science]. — Lars‐Gunnar Gunnarsson, Robin Fondberg, et al. · PubMed (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS