In Reply:

In Reply: We thank Drs. Sutkin, Ollendorff, and Gaba for their interest in our article in the September 2024 issue, and we value the opportunity to discuss the trial design.1 In this randomized controlled trial, the control group completed the standard curriculum during the 4-week gynecology rotation. The experimental group completed the standard curriculum with the addition of video coaching sessions. The primary outcome was the comparison of modified GOALS (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) and OSA-LS (Objective Structured Assessment of Laparoscopic Salpingectomy) scores between the control and video-based coaching groups for videos 1, 2, and 3. We appreciate the Letter writers' discussion regarding educational trial design. Indeed, we did approach the study design with equipoise. Video-based coaching is a novel concept that traditionally has not been used in obstetrics and gynecology resident education curricula. For the purpose of this study, half of the residents did not receive video coaching; however, residents repeat the gynecology rotation two to three times as junior learners and may receive coaching at a later time. We designed the study in this manner so that it would be feasible to execute and complete an evaluation of this novel educational method. Using a preintervention and postintervention study design would be pragmatically challenging—to complete two coaching sessions for every resident enrolled to achieve a minimum sample size for adequate power using one surgical coach. Additionally, challenges in academic medicine balancing clinical responsibilities, faculty time restrictions, resident work hour restrictions, and varying rotating schedules would make this study design difficult to accomplish in a timely manner. Therefore, the intent of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of video coaching on trainees’ laparoscopic surgical skills using an objective measure (validated assessment scales). Because our study has demonstrated benefits to coaching, programs will need to consider how best to feasibly incorporate video coaching into the surgical education curriculum for all trainees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005763
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Reply:

Lisa Chao, J Pruszyński, Teale M. Muir, Nicole Donnellan et al.
1 citations
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
0.40
article

In Reply:

Lisa Chao, J Pruszyński, Teale M. Muir, Nicole Donnellan, Kimberly A. Kho, Christina I. Ramirez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In Reply: We thank Drs. Sutkin, Ollendorff, and Gaba for their interest in our article in the September 2024 issue, and we value the opportunity to discuss the trial design.1 In this randomized controlled trial, the control group completed the standard curriculum during the 4-week gynecology rotation. The experimental group completed the standard curriculum with the addition of video coaching sessions. The primary outcome was the comparison of modified GOALS (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) and OSA-LS (Objective Structured Assessment of Laparoscopic Salpingectomy) scores between the control and video-based coaching groups for videos 1, 2, and 3. We appreciate the Letter writers' discussion regarding educational trial design. Indeed, we did approach the study design with equipoise. Video-based coaching is a novel concept that traditionally has not been used in obstetrics and gynecology resident education curricula. For the purpose of this study, half of the residents did not receive video coaching; however, residents repeat the gynecology rotation two to three times as junior learners and may receive coaching at a later time. We designed the study in this manner so that it would be feasible to execute and complete an evaluation of this novel educational method. Using a preintervention and postintervention study design would be pragmatically challenging—to complete two coaching sessions for every resident enrolled to achieve a minimum sample size for adequate power using one surgical coach. Additionally, challenges in academic medicine balancing clinical responsibilities, faculty time restrictions, resident work hour restrictions, and varying rotating schedules would make this study design difficult to accomplish in a timely manner. Therefore, the intent of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of video coaching on trainees’ laparoscopic surgical skills using an objective measure (validated assessment scales). Because our study has demonstrated benefits to coaching, programs will need to consider how best to feasibly incorporate video coaching into the surgical education curriculum for all trainees.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 144(6)
Brooke Army Medical Center (US), Magee-Womens Hospital (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Joint Base San Antonio (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.