Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition: Analysis of Appalachian English

Abstract The rise of artificial intelligence has prompted increased scrutiny of systemic biases in automatic speech recognition technologies. One focal topic of discussion has been the degraded performance for speakers of African American and Southern U.S. English. This study aims to contribute to the research on bias in voice-AI by investigating speech recognition performance for Appalachian English, an often-stigmatized variety in American society. Participants were recruited from Southern Appalachia (Eastern Tennessee), with a non-Southern Appalachian (Central Pennsylvania) sample included as a reference group. The participants read aloud a version of the “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” fairy tale and the Rainbow Passage, and the recordings were processed using Dartmouth Linguistic Automation (DARLA). The authors conducted two sets of analyses on the vowel phonemes. The first analysis assessed DARLA's effectiveness in recognizing vowels. The system returned higher phoneme error rates for Southern Appalachian speech compared to the non-Southern dataset. Next, they conducted a detailed error analysis on the misrecognized input-output phoneme pairs. The results suggested dialect bias in the system, with 50.2% of the errors in the Southern dataset attributed to participation in the Southern Vowel Shift. These findings underscore the importance of integrating sociolectal variation into the acoustic model to mitigate dialect bias for currently underserved users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Speech
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-11466494
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition: Analysis of Appalachian English

Li-Fang Lai, Janet G. van Hell, John M. Lipski
1 citations
American Speech
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
1.88
article

Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition: Analysis of Appalachian English

Li-Fang Lai, Janet G. van Hell, John M. Lipski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rise of artificial intelligence has prompted increased scrutiny of systemic biases in automatic speech recognition technologies. One focal topic of discussion has been the degraded performance for speakers of African American and Southern U.S. English. This study aims to contribute to the research on bias in voice-AI by investigating speech recognition performance for Appalachian English, an often-stigmatized variety in American society. Participants were recruited from Southern Appalachia (Eastern Tennessee), with a non-Southern Appalachian (Central Pennsylvania) sample included as a reference group. The participants read aloud a version of the “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” fairy tale and the Rainbow Passage, and the recordings were processed using Dartmouth Linguistic Automation (DARLA). The authors conducted two sets of analyses on the vowel phonemes. The first analysis assessed DARLA's effectiveness in recognizing vowels. The system returned higher phoneme error rates for Southern Appalachian speech compared to the non-Southern dataset. Next, they conducted a detailed error analysis on the misrecognized input-output phoneme pairs. The results suggested dialect bias in the system, with 50.2% of the errors in the Southern dataset attributed to participation in the Southern Vowel Shift. These findings underscore the importance of integrating sociolectal variation into the acoustic model to mitigate dialect bias for currently underserved users.

American SpeechVol. 100(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Cixian People's Hospital (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.