Unpacking the Digital Markets Act: a milestone ruling against ByteDance and its implications for potential gatekeepers

The General Court of the European Union recently issued the first substantive ruling addressing the interpretation of the EU Digital Markets Act. In that ruling – in Case T-1077/2 ByteDance v. Commission – the General Court endorsed the European Commission’s approach to applying the ‘gatekeeper’ criteria under Article 3(1) of the Digital Markets Act, confirming the Commission’s decision to designate ByteDance as a gatekeeper in respect of its online social networking service, TikTok. This article explains the context in which the dispute between ByteDance and the Commission arose, including the process through which the initial group of gatekeepers was designated. It then goes on to dissect the General Court’s reasoning and comment on its implications for future enforcement of the Digital Markets Act – particularly when it comes to the designation of additional gatekeepers and/or core platform services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Competition Law Journal
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.02.03
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Digital Markets Act: a milestone ruling against ByteDance and its implications for potential gatekeepers

Christophe Humpe, Ciara Barbu-O’Connor, Gregory Dowell, Roque Botas-Armero
Competition Law Journal
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Unpacking the Digital Markets Act: a milestone ruling against ByteDance and its implications for potential gatekeepers

Christophe Humpe, Ciara Barbu-O’Connor, Gregory Dowell, Roque Botas-Armero
article en

Abstract

The General Court of the European Union recently issued the first substantive ruling addressing the interpretation of the EU Digital Markets Act. In that ruling – in Case T-1077/2 ByteDance v. Commission – the General Court endorsed the European Commission’s approach to applying the ‘gatekeeper’ criteria under Article 3(1) of the Digital Markets Act, confirming the Commission’s decision to designate ByteDance as a gatekeeper in respect of its online social networking service, TikTok. This article explains the context in which the dispute between ByteDance and the Commission arose, including the process through which the initial group of gatekeepers was designated. It then goes on to dissect the General Court’s reasoning and comment on its implications for future enforcement of the Digital Markets Act – particularly when it comes to the designation of additional gatekeepers and/or core platform services.

Competition Law JournalVol. 23(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking the Digital Markets Act: a milestone ruling against ByteDance and its implications for potential gatekeepers — Christophe Humpe, Ciara Barbu-O’Connor, et al. · Competition Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS