Nothing really matters: evaluating demand-side moderators of age discrimination in hiring

Abstract As age discrimination hampers the OECD’s ambition to extend the working population, an efficient anti-discrimination policy targeted at the right employers is critical. Therefore, the context in which age discrimination is most prevalent must be identified. In this study, we thoroughly review the current theoretical arguments and empirical findings regarding moderators of age discrimination in different demand-side domains (i.e. decision-maker, vacancy, occupation, organization and sector). Our review demonstrates that the current literature is highly fragmented and often lacks field-experimental evidence, raising concerns about its internal and external validity. To address this gap, we conducted a correspondence experiment and systematically linked the resulting data to external data sources. In so doing, we were able to study the priorly determined demand-side moderators within a single multi-level analysis and simultaneously control multiple correlations between potential moderators and discrimination estimates. Having done so, we found no empirical support for any of these moderators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae070
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nothing really matters: evaluating demand-side moderators of age discrimination in hiring

Stijn Baert, Axana Dalle, Louis Lippens
Socio-Economic Review
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Nothing really matters: evaluating demand-side moderators of age discrimination in hiring

Stijn Baert, Axana Dalle, Louis Lippens
article en

Abstract

Abstract As age discrimination hampers the OECD’s ambition to extend the working population, an efficient anti-discrimination policy targeted at the right employers is critical. Therefore, the context in which age discrimination is most prevalent must be identified. In this study, we thoroughly review the current theoretical arguments and empirical findings regarding moderators of age discrimination in different demand-side domains (i.e. decision-maker, vacancy, occupation, organization and sector). Our review demonstrates that the current literature is highly fragmented and often lacks field-experimental evidence, raising concerns about its internal and external validity. To address this gap, we conducted a correspondence experiment and systematically linked the resulting data to external data sources. In so doing, we were able to study the priorly determined demand-side moderators within a single multi-level analysis and simultaneously control multiple correlations between potential moderators and discrimination estimates. Having done so, we found no empirical support for any of these moderators.

Socio-Economic ReviewVol. 23(3)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Research Foundation - Flanders (BE), Ghent University (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nothing really matters: evaluating demand-side moderators of age discrimination in hiring — Stijn Baert, Axana Dalle, et al. · Socio-Economic Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS