Comparison of the Performance of Metal Contaminant Detection Using an Optically Pumped Magnetometer With an HTS SQUID

We have constructed a system to detect small metallic particles by using high-temperature superconductor (HTS) superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) gradiometers and have implemented it in a factory. Recently, there has been a remarkable improvement in the sensitivity of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) that operate at room temperature without cryogen, despite the limitations of the ambient magnetic field. Therefore, in this study, we tested the capability of the OPM by installing it in the inspection system. Since the OPM cannot operate unless the magnetic flux density in all directions (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</i>, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Y</i>, and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Z</i>) is below 50 nT, a multi-layered magnetic shield with a higher shielding factor is required to keep the magnetic field sufficiently low. However, the inspection system has a strong permanent magnet to magnetize the metallic particles, making it even more difficult to achieve. To overcome this, two magnetic shields were placed in series, which separated the OPM from the permanent magnet. We prepared a small metallic sample for the test and compared its signal-to-noise ratio (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SNR</i>) with that of an HTS SQUID gradiometer. The distance from the sensor sensitivity position to the test object, i.e., the stand-off distance, was set to 2 mm for the SQUID gradiometer but necessarily 7.2 mm for the OPM because the center of sensitivity is 6.2 mm away from the sensor surface. Samples of SUS304 steel wire pieces were prepared. The samples were magnetized horizontally with a permanent magnet before the measurement. As a result, clear signals with <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SNR</i> > 3 were obtained for the φ30 × L30 µm and φ20 × L61 µm samples with both sensors. With the SQUID, a clear peak signal was obtained in the smaller sample (φ20 × L38 µm), but with the OPM, the peak was somehow visible but buried in noise. Although OPMs do not require cooling facilities, they are still difficult to apply to a high-end metal contaminant inspection system at present. If further efforts are made to shorten the stand-off distance, the application of OPMs will be further expanded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tasc.2024.3507748
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Performance of Metal Contaminant Detection Using an Optically Pumped Magnetometer With an HTS SQUID

Takeyoshi Ohtani, K. Hayashi, Saburo Tanaka
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Comparison of the Performance of Metal Contaminant Detection Using an Optically Pumped Magnetometer With an HTS SQUID

Takeyoshi Ohtani, K. Hayashi, Saburo Tanaka
article en

Abstract

We have constructed a system to detect small metallic particles by using high-temperature superconductor (HTS) superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) gradiometers and have implemented it in a factory. Recently, there has been a remarkable improvement in the sensitivity of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) that operate at room temperature without cryogen, despite the limitations of the ambient magnetic field. Therefore, in this study, we tested the capability of the OPM by installing it in the inspection system. Since the OPM cannot operate unless the magnetic flux density in all directions (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</i>, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Y</i>, and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Z</i>) is below 50 nT, a multi-layered magnetic shield with a higher shielding factor is required to keep the magnetic field sufficiently low. However, the inspection system has a strong permanent magnet to magnetize the metallic particles, making it even more difficult to achieve. To overcome this, two magnetic shields were placed in series, which separated the OPM from the permanent magnet. We prepared a small metallic sample for the test and compared its signal-to-noise ratio (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SNR</i>) with that of an HTS SQUID gradiometer. The distance from the sensor sensitivity position to the test object, i.e., the stand-off distance, was set to 2 mm for the SQUID gradiometer but necessarily 7.2 mm for the OPM because the center of sensitivity is 6.2 mm away from the sensor surface. Samples of SUS304 steel wire pieces were prepared. The samples were magnetized horizontally with a permanent magnet before the measurement. As a result, clear signals with <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SNR</i> > 3 were obtained for the φ30 × L30 µm and φ20 × L61 µm samples with both sensors. With the SQUID, a clear peak signal was obtained in the smaller sample (φ20 × L38 µm), but with the OPM, the peak was somehow visible but buried in noise. Although OPMs do not require cooling facilities, they are still difficult to apply to a high-end metal contaminant inspection system at present. If further efforts are made to shorten the stand-off distance, the application of OPMs will be further expanded.

IEEE Transactions on Applied SuperconductivityVol. 35(5)
Toyohashi University of Technology (JP), Denka (Japan) (JP), Denso (Japan) (JP)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.