Who is vulnerable in regional energy transitions? An intersectional energy justice analysis of the Rotterdam-the Hague region

A just energy transition requires not only the achievement of low-carbon goals but also the creation of fairer energy systems where special attention is given to identifying vulnerable groups and addressing the inequalities they experience. Governing energy transitions at the regional level may help formulate and implement tailored policies addressing vulnerabilities at the local level. However, there is limited understanding of the vulnerabilities that citizen groups experience in energy regions. We formulated three objectives to address this gap: I) identifying energy vulnerabilities in a regional transition context; II) understanding what citizen groups experience them and why; and III) identifying barriers that prevent policies from engaging with these groups. We applied a case-study research design to the Rotterdam-The Hague energy region in the Netherlands. Data collection involved semi-structured expert and stakeholder interviews and a review of newspaper articles and policy reports. We processed data with a thematic analysis drawing from energy justice literature and intersectionality theory. Three main energy vulnerabilities were identified: unaffordability of energy consumption, the lack of opportunity to own self-generation technology, and little to no inclusion in decision-making processes. The findings reveal five groups prone to vulnerability and the conditions that put them in a vulnerable situation, such as living in an energy-inefficient house. We conclude that regional energy transition policies should consider intersections of society while offering more support to municipalities to enable them to engage citizen groups at higher risk of energy vulnerability. • Citizen energy vulnerability is an intersectional justice phenomenon • We analyze energy affordability, local ownership, and decision-making inclusivity • Vulnerability occurs when one or more vulnerability conditions are met • Energy regions can help coordinate mitigation efforts across municipalities • An intersectional justice analysis can identify vulnerable groups in a region

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103859
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is vulnerable in regional energy transitions? An intersectional energy justice analysis of the Rotterdam-the Hague region

Özge Okur, Thomas Hoppe, Stephanie Wolters, Amanda Martínez-Reyes et al.
4 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.53
article

Who is vulnerable in regional energy transitions? An intersectional energy justice analysis of the Rotterdam-the Hague region

Özge Okur, Thomas Hoppe, Stephanie Wolters, Amanda Martínez-Reyes, Olaf Luijk
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A just energy transition requires not only the achievement of low-carbon goals but also the creation of fairer energy systems where special attention is given to identifying vulnerable groups and addressing the inequalities they experience. Governing energy transitions at the regional level may help formulate and implement tailored policies addressing vulnerabilities at the local level. However, there is limited understanding of the vulnerabilities that citizen groups experience in energy regions. We formulated three objectives to address this gap: I) identifying energy vulnerabilities in a regional transition context; II) understanding what citizen groups experience them and why; and III) identifying barriers that prevent policies from engaging with these groups. We applied a case-study research design to the Rotterdam-The Hague energy region in the Netherlands. Data collection involved semi-structured expert and stakeholder interviews and a review of newspaper articles and policy reports. We processed data with a thematic analysis drawing from energy justice literature and intersectionality theory. Three main energy vulnerabilities were identified: unaffordability of energy consumption, the lack of opportunity to own self-generation technology, and little to no inclusion in decision-making processes. The findings reveal five groups prone to vulnerability and the conditions that put them in a vulnerable situation, such as living in an energy-inefficient house. We conclude that regional energy transition policies should consider intersections of society while offering more support to municipalities to enable them to engage citizen groups at higher risk of energy vulnerability. • Citizen energy vulnerability is an intersectional justice phenomenon • We analyze energy affordability, local ownership, and decision-making inclusivity • Vulnerability occurs when one or more vulnerability conditions are met • Energy regions can help coordinate mitigation efforts across municipalities • An intersectional justice analysis can identify vulnerable groups in a region

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 119
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.