Free VS. Paid Software in Strutural Modeling: Results from Amos and R Studio Lavaan in Organizational Climate Analysis

Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the results of structural equation models with latent variables (SEM) using the covariance-based maximum likelihood method, employing two different software applications for this purpose (Amos and R Studio Lavaan). Theoretical Framework: This article presents the main concepts and theories underlying this research, addressing the use of SEM in organizational climate analysis and its importance in the educational context to evaluate key constructs in institutional dynamics. Method: The constructs were derived from an organizational climate evaluation of a higher education institution in Mexico. The “Organizational Climate Inventory” was applied, selecting five subscales: Satisfaction, Pride and Belonging, Clarity of Goals and Objectives, Collaborative Work, and Efficiency and Effectiveness. Administrative, managerial, academic, and service staff were invited to participate, achieving a sample of n = 801. Results and Discussion: The results from Amos vs. R Studio Lavaan confirmed that there were no significant differences between the SEMs regarding paths, standardized regression coefficients, R², goodness-of-fit indices, and correlation coefficients. Efficiency and Effectiveness (83.0%) was explained by the influence of Clarity of Goals and Objectives (0.11), Satisfaction (0.26), Collaborative Work (0.31), and Pride and Belonging (0.37) based on standardized regression coefficients. Collaborative Work (52.0%) was explained by the influence of Clarity of Goals and Objectives (0.49) and Pride and Belonging (0.29). The instrument demonstrated reliability levels above 0.70, as well as convergent validity greater than 0.50 and discriminant validity above 0.70 across all subscales. Research Implications: Theoretical and practical implications of this study highlight the feasibility of using free software for SEM analysis, offering institutions an efficient and accessible alternative. Originality/Value: This Study Contributes to the Literature by Validating the Use of Free Software as An Effective and Accurate Tool for Structural Analysis in Educational Contexts Without Additional Costs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n11-247
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Free VS. Paid Software in Strutural Modeling: Results from Amos and R Studio Lavaan in Organizational Climate Analysis

Ignacio Martínez, Víctor Xochitototl Nava, Carlos Flores, Blanca Rosa García Rivera
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Free VS. Paid Software in Strutural Modeling: Results from Amos and R Studio Lavaan in Organizational Climate Analysis

Ignacio Martínez, Víctor Xochitototl Nava, Carlos Flores, Blanca Rosa García Rivera
article en

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the results of structural equation models with latent variables (SEM) using the covariance-based maximum likelihood method, employing two different software applications for this purpose (Amos and R Studio Lavaan). Theoretical Framework: This article presents the main concepts and theories underlying this research, addressing the use of SEM in organizational climate analysis and its importance in the educational context to evaluate key constructs in institutional dynamics. Method: The constructs were derived from an organizational climate evaluation of a higher education institution in Mexico. The “Organizational Climate Inventory” was applied, selecting five subscales: Satisfaction, Pride and Belonging, Clarity of Goals and Objectives, Collaborative Work, and Efficiency and Effectiveness. Administrative, managerial, academic, and service staff were invited to participate, achieving a sample of n = 801. Results and Discussion: The results from Amos vs. R Studio Lavaan confirmed that there were no significant differences between the SEMs regarding paths, standardized regression coefficients, R², goodness-of-fit indices, and correlation coefficients. Efficiency and Effectiveness (83.0%) was explained by the influence of Clarity of Goals and Objectives (0.11), Satisfaction (0.26), Collaborative Work (0.31), and Pride and Belonging (0.37) based on standardized regression coefficients. Collaborative Work (52.0%) was explained by the influence of Clarity of Goals and Objectives (0.49) and Pride and Belonging (0.29). The instrument demonstrated reliability levels above 0.70, as well as convergent validity greater than 0.50 and discriminant validity above 0.70 across all subscales. Research Implications: Theoretical and practical implications of this study highlight the feasibility of using free software for SEM analysis, offering institutions an efficient and accessible alternative. Originality/Value: This Study Contributes to the Literature by Validating the Use of Free Software as An Effective and Accurate Tool for Structural Analysis in Educational Contexts Without Additional Costs.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 18(11)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.