Behavior of an Embankment on Soft Ground Improved with Soil–Geopolymer Deep Mix Columns under Static and Cyclic Loadings

The soil–cement deep soil mixing (DSM) technique has been widely used to improve the bearing capacity of the soft soil under embankment loading. However, utilizing ordinary portland cement (OPC) releases a tremendous carbon footprint. Industrial waste–based geopolymer has emerged as a sustainable and environmentally friendly solution for stabilizing soft soils. This work investigates the behavior of embankment models constructed on geopolymer-stabilized soil columns (GPSCs) under static and cyclic loading conditions similar to transportation routes. A series of static and cyclic loading tests were carried out on the reduced-scale designed embankment model resting on soft soil (cus = 5 kPa) reinforced with end-bearing (l/h = 1) and floating (l/h = 0.75) GPSCs with area replacement ratios (Ar) of 12.7%, 17%, and 21.2% to analyze the vertical stress–settlement behavior of the improved ground. Earth pressure cells were used to measure the vertical stress on the column and the adjacent surrounding soil under static and cyclic embankment loading. A pore-pressure transducer was used to monitor the excess pore-water pressure generated during the loading process. The results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity (qult) improvement for end-bearing GPSCs was 246.92%, 344.56%, and 418.8%, whereas the improvement for floating GPSCs was 126.9%, 151%, and 181.64% for Ar values of 12.7%, 17%, and 21.2%, respectively. Furthermore, the stress concentration ratio increases and excess pore-water pressure decreases with increasing Ar and l/h ratios. A mathematical equation was also derived to determine the qult value with Ar and l/h ratios. End-bearing GPSCs were more effective than floating GPSCs at the same Ar under static and cyclic loading. For installing floating GPSCs, a higher area replacement ratio is required for better load bearing under static and cyclic loading. In addition, a life cycle assessment of the geopolymer compared to OPC was performed, showing that the geopolymer is a sustainable and eco-friendly construction material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-10587
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior of an Embankment on Soft Ground Improved with Soil–Geopolymer Deep Mix Columns under Static and Cyclic Loadings

Sanjoli Gupta, Suresh Kumar, N. Muni Pradeep, Mayank Nishant
7 citations
International Journal of Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.83
article

Behavior of an Embankment on Soft Ground Improved with Soil–Geopolymer Deep Mix Columns under Static and Cyclic Loadings

Sanjoli Gupta, Suresh Kumar, N. Muni Pradeep, Mayank Nishant
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The soil–cement deep soil mixing (DSM) technique has been widely used to improve the bearing capacity of the soft soil under embankment loading. However, utilizing ordinary portland cement (OPC) releases a tremendous carbon footprint. Industrial waste–based geopolymer has emerged as a sustainable and environmentally friendly solution for stabilizing soft soils. This work investigates the behavior of embankment models constructed on geopolymer-stabilized soil columns (GPSCs) under static and cyclic loading conditions similar to transportation routes. A series of static and cyclic loading tests were carried out on the reduced-scale designed embankment model resting on soft soil (cus = 5 kPa) reinforced with end-bearing (l/h = 1) and floating (l/h = 0.75) GPSCs with area replacement ratios (Ar) of 12.7%, 17%, and 21.2% to analyze the vertical stress–settlement behavior of the improved ground. Earth pressure cells were used to measure the vertical stress on the column and the adjacent surrounding soil under static and cyclic embankment loading. A pore-pressure transducer was used to monitor the excess pore-water pressure generated during the loading process. The results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity (qult) improvement for end-bearing GPSCs was 246.92%, 344.56%, and 418.8%, whereas the improvement for floating GPSCs was 126.9%, 151%, and 181.64% for Ar values of 12.7%, 17%, and 21.2%, respectively. Furthermore, the stress concentration ratio increases and excess pore-water pressure decreases with increasing Ar and l/h ratios. A mathematical equation was also derived to determine the qult value with Ar and l/h ratios. End-bearing GPSCs were more effective than floating GPSCs at the same Ar under static and cyclic loading. For installing floating GPSCs, a higher area replacement ratio is required for better load bearing under static and cyclic loading. In addition, a life cycle assessment of the geopolymer compared to OPC was performed, showing that the geopolymer is a sustainable and eco-friendly construction material.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(2)
Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.