Comparative study of turbulence models in CFD for transonic flow over the ONERA M6 wing

Abstract Transonic flight presents significant challenges due to complex phenomena such as shock waves and turbulent boundary layer interactions, often leading to flow separation and instabilities. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various turbulence models in predicting these phenomena using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with ANSYS-Fluent 2020R1. The ONERA M6 wing model is analyzed under specific flow conditions (angle of attack, α = 3.06°, Mach number, M∞ = 0.8395, and Reynolds number, Re = 11.72 × 10^6) to assess five turbulence models: Spalart–Allmaras, k-ε Standard, k-ε Realizable, k-ω Standard, and k-ω SST. Results from the simulations closely matched experimental data, with all models demonstrating a margin of error within 5% compared to NASA’s CFD benchmarks. Notably, the Spalart–Allmaras and k-ω SST models showed superior accuracy in predicting shock formation and pressure distribution, highlighting their potential for enhanced predictive capabilities in aerodynamic analysis. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ANSYS-Fluent in aerodynamic performance evaluation and suggests pathways for advancing aircraft design efficiency and safety through improved turbulence modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Mechanical Engineering
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44245-024-00080-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of turbulence models in CFD for transonic flow over the ONERA M6 wing

Md. Hasib Mahmud Mazumder
3 citations
Discover Mechanical Engineering
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.12
article

Comparative study of turbulence models in CFD for transonic flow over the ONERA M6 wing

Md. Hasib Mahmud Mazumder
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Transonic flight presents significant challenges due to complex phenomena such as shock waves and turbulent boundary layer interactions, often leading to flow separation and instabilities. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various turbulence models in predicting these phenomena using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with ANSYS-Fluent 2020R1. The ONERA M6 wing model is analyzed under specific flow conditions (angle of attack, α = 3.06°, Mach number, M∞ = 0.8395, and Reynolds number, Re = 11.72 × 10^6) to assess five turbulence models: Spalart–Allmaras, k-ε Standard, k-ε Realizable, k-ω Standard, and k-ω SST. Results from the simulations closely matched experimental data, with all models demonstrating a margin of error within 5% compared to NASA’s CFD benchmarks. Notably, the Spalart–Allmaras and k-ω SST models showed superior accuracy in predicting shock formation and pressure distribution, highlighting their potential for enhanced predictive capabilities in aerodynamic analysis. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ANSYS-Fluent in aerodynamic performance evaluation and suggests pathways for advancing aircraft design efficiency and safety through improved turbulence modeling.

Discover Mechanical EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study of turbulence models in CFD for transonic flow over the ONERA M6 wing — Md. Hasib Mahmud Mazumder · Discover Mechanical Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS