A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study

Background Although laparoscopic surgery is becoming more common, its anesthetic management poses challenges due to hemodynamic fluctuations. Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in mitigating these responses. In this study, we compared the effects of three different infusion doses of dexmedetomidine (0.2 µg/kg/hour, 0.4 µg/kg/hour, and 0.6 µg/kg/hour) on hemodynamic responses at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology An observational study was conducted among 90 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups, each receiving one of the three dexmedetomidine doses. Hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, etc.) were monitored at various time points throughout the procedure. Results All three dexmedetomidine doses effectively attenuated hemodynamic responses. The 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose demonstrated the most stable blood pressure control, with minimal fluctuations from baseline. The 0.6 µg/kg/hour dose consistently resulted in lower mean blood pressure values. Heart rate was also more stable in the 0.4 µg/kg/hour group, while the 0.6 µg/kg/hour group consistently maintained lower heart rates. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine is a valuable anesthetic adjuvant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose offering a favorable balance between hemodynamic stability and the potential risk of hypotension and bradycardia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74538
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study

Rachna Verma, Manoj Kumar Giri, Amra Nadeem, Narendra Singh Bafila et al.
Cureus
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study

Rachna Verma, Manoj Kumar Giri, Amra Nadeem, Narendra Singh Bafila, Sanni Deyol Gautam, Deepak Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background Although laparoscopic surgery is becoming more common, its anesthetic management poses challenges due to hemodynamic fluctuations. Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in mitigating these responses. In this study, we compared the effects of three different infusion doses of dexmedetomidine (0.2 µg/kg/hour, 0.4 µg/kg/hour, and 0.6 µg/kg/hour) on hemodynamic responses at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology An observational study was conducted among 90 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups, each receiving one of the three dexmedetomidine doses. Hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, etc.) were monitored at various time points throughout the procedure. Results All three dexmedetomidine doses effectively attenuated hemodynamic responses. The 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose demonstrated the most stable blood pressure control, with minimal fluctuations from baseline. The 0.6 µg/kg/hour dose consistently resulted in lower mean blood pressure values. Heart rate was also more stable in the 0.4 µg/kg/hour group, while the 0.6 µg/kg/hour group consistently maintained lower heart rates. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine is a valuable anesthetic adjuvant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose offering a favorable balance between hemodynamic stability and the potential risk of hypotension and bradycardia.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Memorial Medical Center (US), Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College (IN), Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital (IN), Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study — Rachna Verma, Manoj Kumar Giri, et al. · Cureus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS