Sensory evaluation of high-marbling beef cuts by Australian and Middle Eastern consumers

This paper compares untrained Middle Eastern and Australian consumer responses to various beef cuts (bolar blade, eye rump centre, eye rump side, outside flat, rump cap, striploin) from purebred Angus and Wagyu×Angus cross cattle using the Meat Standard Australia (MSA) protocol. In each country (the United Arab Emirates and Australia), a total of 360 participants evaluated the tenderness, juiciness, flavour, and overall liking of 1,260 grilled samples. Ten consumers ate each sample and each consumer tested 6 research samples. The results reveal that muscle type had a significant impact on all sensory attributes. The highest sensory scores were predominantly observed in the rump cap muscle, whereas the lowest scores were associated with the outside flat muscle. There were similarities in sensory scores across both countries. Cattle breed had a substantial impact on tenderness, while other meat-eating properties remained unaffected. The interaction between country and muscle type had a considerable influence on meat sensory scores, with the rump cap muscle exhibiting the most pronounced differences between the two countries. No other significant interactions were observed. This study affirms that the MSA model can be used for grilled premium Australian beef evaluation in the Middle East, with some adjustments to the consumer perception. This study has also assisted Australian beef exporters in gaining a deeper understanding of Middle Eastern consumers' preferences within the premium quality beef segment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science of Animal Resources
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e116
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensory evaluation of high-marbling beef cuts by Australian and Middle Eastern consumers

P. McGilchrist, Rodney Polkinghorne, Don V. Nguyen
Food Science of Animal Resources
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Sensory evaluation of high-marbling beef cuts by Australian and Middle Eastern consumers

P. McGilchrist, Rodney Polkinghorne, Don V. Nguyen
article en

Abstract

This paper compares untrained Middle Eastern and Australian consumer responses to various beef cuts (bolar blade, eye rump centre, eye rump side, outside flat, rump cap, striploin) from purebred Angus and Wagyu×Angus cross cattle using the Meat Standard Australia (MSA) protocol. In each country (the United Arab Emirates and Australia), a total of 360 participants evaluated the tenderness, juiciness, flavour, and overall liking of 1,260 grilled samples. Ten consumers ate each sample and each consumer tested 6 research samples. The results reveal that muscle type had a significant impact on all sensory attributes. The highest sensory scores were predominantly observed in the rump cap muscle, whereas the lowest scores were associated with the outside flat muscle. There were similarities in sensory scores across both countries. Cattle breed had a substantial impact on tenderness, while other meat-eating properties remained unaffected. The interaction between country and muscle type had a considerable influence on meat sensory scores, with the rump cap muscle exhibiting the most pronounced differences between the two countries. No other significant interactions were observed. This study affirms that the MSA model can be used for grilled premium Australian beef evaluation in the Middle East, with some adjustments to the consumer perception. This study has also assisted Australian beef exporters in gaining a deeper understanding of Middle Eastern consumers' preferences within the premium quality beef segment.

Food Science of Animal ResourcesVol. 45(5)
BirdLife Australia (AU), University of New England (AU)
Meat and Livestock Australia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.