FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT FIBER POST MATERIALS (IN VITRO STUDY)

Background: Posts must be built of a material with great strength and an elastic modulus close to that of natural dentin. To date, there’s no material that meets these demands.Purpose: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance and failure patterns of bundle glass fiber posts in comparison to conventional fiber posts. Materials and Methods: Eighteen extracted permanent second mandibular premolars were selected to receive fiber posts. Based on the material type, teeth were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 9). Group (RGP): bundle glass fiber post; Group (CP): conventional fiber post. Following the root canal's cleaning, shaping, and obturation. Post holes were then created, and core building was performed. The fracture resistance of the restored teeth was determined in Newtons using a universal test device acting at a speed of 0.5 mm/minute and a 45-degree inclined load. An optical microscope was employed to assess the mode of failure.Results: Group CP had a median score of 424.52N, with values ranging from 102.33N to 570.86N, Group RGP had a median score of 394.71N, with values ranging from 168.21N to 827. 09N. The Mann Whitney U test indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance values among the group (p value 0.691). There was no statistically significant difference between the two study groups regarding mode of failure (p value 1.00).Conclusion: The findings indicate that utilizing bundle posts could serve as an effective alternative to single fiber post. Both types of posts showed similar fracture resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Dental Journal
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2024.310310.1529
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT FIBER POST MATERIALS (IN VITRO STUDY)

Yasser Aly, Mahdi Halabi, Samir Ibrahim Bakry
Alexandria Dental Journal
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
article

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT FIBER POST MATERIALS (IN VITRO STUDY)

Yasser Aly, Mahdi Halabi, Samir Ibrahim Bakry
article en

Abstract

Background: Posts must be built of a material with great strength and an elastic modulus close to that of natural dentin. To date, there’s no material that meets these demands.Purpose: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance and failure patterns of bundle glass fiber posts in comparison to conventional fiber posts. Materials and Methods: Eighteen extracted permanent second mandibular premolars were selected to receive fiber posts. Based on the material type, teeth were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 9). Group (RGP): bundle glass fiber post; Group (CP): conventional fiber post. Following the root canal's cleaning, shaping, and obturation. Post holes were then created, and core building was performed. The fracture resistance of the restored teeth was determined in Newtons using a universal test device acting at a speed of 0.5 mm/minute and a 45-degree inclined load. An optical microscope was employed to assess the mode of failure.Results: Group CP had a median score of 424.52N, with values ranging from 102.33N to 570.86N, Group RGP had a median score of 394.71N, with values ranging from 168.21N to 827. 09N. The Mann Whitney U test indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance values among the group (p value 0.691). There was no statistically significant difference between the two study groups regarding mode of failure (p value 1.00).Conclusion: The findings indicate that utilizing bundle posts could serve as an effective alternative to single fiber post. Both types of posts showed similar fracture resistance.

Alexandria Dental JournalVol. 0(0)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.