A Comparative Study Of Two-Hourly Versus Three-Hourly Feeding In Stable Preterm Neonates

Background: Babies who weigh between 1000 and 1500 grams are considered very low birth weight (VLBW) and are more challenging to feed because the majority of them have feed intolerance, poor feeding skills at birth, and a risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of feeding babies who were born before their due date on growth metrics, respiratory tolerance, and the amount of time it took to achieve full enteral feeding. Material and Methods: Among stable preterm newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), a comparative open-label study was carried out. About 45 cases each in the 2-hourly group and 3-hourly group made up the final sample size. Neonatal data, such as age, gender, gestational age, weight at birth, weight at admission, 5-minute Apgar score, hyperbilirubinemia symptoms and indicators, and history of complaints upon admission, were gathered. Every neonate hospitalised for preterm care underwent a clinical assessment in the NICU. Enteral feeding was administered every two hours to the first group and every three hours to the second.  Following the neonate's stabilisation, expressed breast milk was started for feeding, and intravenous fluid was given to the first group until the enteral feed achieved a volume of 120 mL/kg/day. Results: In both groups, there were more males than female babies. In 31.1% of the cases in the two-hourly group and in 40.0% of the individuals in the three-hourly group, the gestational age was 35 weeks. About 13.3% of the 2 hourly group and 77.8% of the 3 hourly group had an APGAR score of greater than 8 after five minutes. In less than an hour, 91.1% of the 3-hour group and 84.4% of the 2-hour group began feeding. Mean time to attain full feeds was 13.5 days in 2 hourly group and 11 days in 3 hourly group which was statistically significant. About 4.4% of the neonates in the two-hourly study had NEC, 8.9% experienced hypoglycemia, and 8.9% had feed intolerance. 4.4% of the neonates in the three-hour group showed feed intolerance, while 4.4% had hypoglycemia. Conclusion: This study had shown that, 3rd hourly feeding was found better than the 2nd hourly feeding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.4151
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study Of Two-Hourly Versus Three-Hourly Feeding In Stable Preterm Neonates

Rana Pratap Rayalu Chalasani
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Infant Nutrition and Health
article

A Comparative Study Of Two-Hourly Versus Three-Hourly Feeding In Stable Preterm Neonates

Rana Pratap Rayalu Chalasani
article en

Abstract

Background: Babies who weigh between 1000 and 1500 grams are considered very low birth weight (VLBW) and are more challenging to feed because the majority of them have feed intolerance, poor feeding skills at birth, and a risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of feeding babies who were born before their due date on growth metrics, respiratory tolerance, and the amount of time it took to achieve full enteral feeding. Material and Methods: Among stable preterm newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), a comparative open-label study was carried out. About 45 cases each in the 2-hourly group and 3-hourly group made up the final sample size. Neonatal data, such as age, gender, gestational age, weight at birth, weight at admission, 5-minute Apgar score, hyperbilirubinemia symptoms and indicators, and history of complaints upon admission, were gathered. Every neonate hospitalised for preterm care underwent a clinical assessment in the NICU. Enteral feeding was administered every two hours to the first group and every three hours to the second.  Following the neonate's stabilisation, expressed breast milk was started for feeding, and intravenous fluid was given to the first group until the enteral feed achieved a volume of 120 mL/kg/day. Results: In both groups, there were more males than female babies. In 31.1% of the cases in the two-hourly group and in 40.0% of the individuals in the three-hourly group, the gestational age was 35 weeks. About 13.3% of the 2 hourly group and 77.8% of the 3 hourly group had an APGAR score of greater than 8 after five minutes. In less than an hour, 91.1% of the 3-hour group and 84.4% of the 2-hour group began feeding. Mean time to attain full feeds was 13.5 days in 2 hourly group and 11 days in 3 hourly group which was statistically significant. About 4.4% of the neonates in the two-hourly study had NEC, 8.9% experienced hypoglycemia, and 8.9% had feed intolerance. 4.4% of the neonates in the three-hour group showed feed intolerance, while 4.4% had hypoglycemia. Conclusion: This study had shown that, 3rd hourly feeding was found better than the 2nd hourly feeding.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study Of Two-Hourly Versus Three-Hourly Feeding In Stable Preterm Neonates — Rana Pratap Rayalu Chalasani · African Journal of Biomedical Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS